House of Lords peers hatch plan to BLOCK Britain leaving the European Union

THE House of Lords is set to make a desperate attempt to delay or even block Britain’s decision to ditch the European Union, a Tory peer has claimed.

Mon, Aug 1

Theresa

GETTY

Peers are planning to block the triggering of Article 50

Baroness Wheatcroft said she felt it was "imperative that the House of Lords don't press the button on Article 50” and hoped the unelected part of Parliament could stop Brexit altogether.

Pro-remain peer Baroness Wheatcroft called on fellow peers to stop any legislation triggering Article 50, which will formally begin the process of leaving Brussels.

 

Theresa

GETTY

Downing Street has dismissed attempts by the House of Lords to block Brexit

The former editor in chief of the Wall Street Journal Europe said she hopes the possible delay on Brexit legislation would lead to a second referendum.

SEE ALSO:-

The House of Lords cannot be

allowed to obstruct Brexit, says

Ross Clark

 

THE British are not much given to revolution but I can envisage one circumstance which would bring the masses out to man the barricades: if an unelected House of Lords decided to try to frustrate the will of the people as expressed through a referendum.

(http://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/695630/House-Lords-cannot-allowed-obstruct-Brexit-says-Ross-Clark)

JUST WHEN WE THOUGHT THAT WE WON THE BREXIT?- Steve 24/07/16

Are Theresa May and Angela

Merkel in the ILLUMINATI?

Conspiracy theorists are convinced

the leaders are in secretive sect

because of similar hand gestures

  • Theresa May dragged into conspiracy theory about a 'secret EU society'
  • The 'secret sign' is a hand signal used by German leader Angela Merkel
  • Jean-Claude Juncker also used the sign meeting Belgian royalty this week 

 

Mrs May used the hand signal - already frequently used by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and European Commission President, Jean-Claude Juncker -  on July 11 when speaking at Westminster before her elevation to 10 Downing Street.

The hand signal is listed on the illuminati hand signs conspiracy theory website illuminatiRex and described as a 'Merkel-Raute'.

 

Prime Minister Theresa May used the hang signal after Andrea Leadsom pulled out of the
 Tory leadership contest outside the Houses of Parliament on July 11

Prime Minister Theresa May used the hang signal after Andrea Leadsom pulled out of the Tory leadership contest outside the Houses of Parliament on July 11

The 'Merkel-Raute' is a reverse variation of the first illuminati 'Roc Sign' - roughly in the shape of a diamond or pyramid - used by celebrities such as actors, Denzel Washington, Ben Stiller and Tom Cruise

Users of the 'Merkel-Raute', as it has become known due to the German's frequent use, have also included other European historical figures including Pope John Paul II and Adolf Hitler.

 'The pyramid is an important Illuminati symbol showing their few ruling the many on the bottom type power structure,' the illuminatiRex website states.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel used the signal in Hamburg on February
 12 when meeting with David Cameron when he was prime minister

German Chancellor Angela Merkel used the signal in Hamburg on February 12 when meeting with David Cameron when he was prime minister

 

Mrs Merkel
 used the hand gesture again on March 9 in Berlin

Mrs Merkel used the hand gesture again on March 9 in Berlin

German Chancellor Theresa May used the
 signal in Frankfurt am Main on May 20

German Chancellor Theresa May used the signal in Frankfurt am Main on May 20

Mrs Merkel attended an event in Berlin on April 12 where she used the gesture again

Mrs Merkel attended an event in Berlin on April 12 where she used the gesture again

Mrs Merkel was at it again at an industrial trade fair in Hanover on April 25

Mrs Merkel was at it again at an industrial trade fair in Hanover on April 25

'The symbol becomes more powerful when the sign is done over an eye, representing the All-Seeing eye in a capstone floating over an unfinished pyramid.'

'The pyramid sign is seen by many researchers to be THE sign of the Illuminati.' 

Mr Juncker was captured using the 'Merkel-Raute' signal this week when he met Belgium royalty on Friday.

But he had also used it on July 7 in Strasbourg, France.

German politician Memet Kilic had noticed the similarities between Mrs May and Mrs Merkel, describing the new PM as a 'competitor' in hand gestures against the German. 

 
 
 
Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission,
 is also a fan of the hand signal

Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission, is also a fan of the hand signal

Mrs Merkel using the hand sign in Berlin on April 12. She is a leading user of the signal, according to conspiracy theorists on the internet who describe it as a 'Merkel-Raute'

Mrs Merkel using the hand sign in Berlin on April 12.

She is a leading user of the signal, according to conspiracy theorists on the internet who describe it as a 'Merkel-Raute'

 

It is no surprise that the IMF got it

wrong over Brexit, says LEO

MCKINSTRY

ARMAGEDDON is on its way if we vote for Brexit, screeched the pro-EU brigade in the run-up to the referendum.

 Thu, Jul 21, 2016

Christine Lagarde

GETTY

IMF managing director Christine Lagarde was criticised over her Brexit predictions

But disaster appears to have been put on hold.

The emptiness of all the hysterical propaganda about the supposed “uncertainty” arising from the referendum was illustrated yesterday by the release of the latest labour market statistics.

In the quarter to May, employment grew by 176,000, while the jobless rate fell to just 4.9 per cent, the lowest for more than a decade.

Related articles

Similarly a study by the Bank of England yesterday showed that consumers and companies have reacted far more calmly to Brexit than the gloom-laden, pro-EU experts forecast.

According to the Bank, there have been “few suggestions of disinvestment” or “major alterations to businesses’ employment intentions”, while in the property market “transactions had so far been more resilient than some had expected”.

But no organisation appears to have misread the impact of Brexit more badly than the International Monetary Fund, the body set up in the aftermath of the Second World War to promote global financial stability and prosperity.

 

In the weeks before the referendum Christine Lagarde, the French politician who has headed the IMF since 2011, could hardly have been more strident in her warnings of the economic calamity that would grip Britain in the event of our withdrawal from the European Union. The outcome, she claimed, would be dire for the UK, ranging from “pretty bad” to “very, very bad”.

It was a prediction based on indepth research by her economists, she said with Gallic assurance.

“We have done our homework and frankly we haven’t seen anything that is positive.”

View of the city from a residential London borough

GETTY

The post-Brexit economy will expand by 1.7 per cent this year and 1.3 per cent next year

Reality has confounded the IMF, as demonstrated by the organisation’s latest forecasts published yesterday. Far from sinking into recession, as it warned in June, the IMF now expects that the post-Brexit economy will expand by 1.7 per cent this year and 1.3 per cent next year. Outstripping both France and Germany, that is a higher growth rate than in any other major industrialised country except the USA.

The reason Lagarde was so mistaken lies in the fact that, like so many members of the international political elite, she has an ideological attachment to “ever closer union” in Europe. Her desire for full political integration was on display in a speech she gave in Vienna a week before the referendum, in which she proclaimed that “only a united Europe can be prosperous and dynamic”, adding that membership of the EU had made the UK “a more diverse, more exciting and more creative country”.

 Brexit: What does it mean for you?

How will pensions, mortgages & house prices be affected by Brexit

     
     
     
     
 So as a determined federalist Lagarde could not be an objective observer but instead used alarmism to undermine the Brexit cause. It might have been driven by pro-EU dogma but her hopelessly inaccurate speculation is just part of a pattern with the IMF

 

Employing a staff of 2,600, most of them well-paid professionals, the IMF should be able to set the gold standard in judgments about economic policy. But when it comes to forecasts it is about as reliable as a cheap fairground psychic.

This is an outfit that completely failed to foresee the arrival of the 2008 financial crash, sparked by dodgy US property loans. Yet in 2006 the IMF stated that “the impact of a slowing housing market on the financial sector is likely to be limited”, while in 2007 it wrote that the global economic outlook is “very favourable”, a verdict that now looks laughably complacent.

Its statements about the British economy have been just as misplaced. Initially, in 2010, the IMF embraced the coalition’s austerity programme. Then in 2013 it performed a complete U-turn when its chief economist Oliver Blanchard argued that George Osborne was “playing with fire” through his cuts strategy.

Protest in Greece against the troika

GETTY

The Greek bailout tragedy is another symbol of IMF's mismanagement

The IMF is an organisation without credibility

Leo McKinstry

A year later, Lagarde had to admit that the IMF’s criticisms had been erroneous. “We clearly underestimated the growth of the UK economy in our forecasts a year ago,” she admitted.

The IMF does not deserve to be heeded any more. It is an organisation without credibility. Instead of presiding over steady growth it has inflicted endless chaos through its posturing and theorising, just like the EU it so admires.

The Greek bailout tragedy, which has reduced that country to misery, is another symbol of its mismanagement. The Ukip MP Douglas Carswell was absolutely right yesterday when he called its leaders “clowns” who have been “seriously wrong for years”.

Christine Lagarde

GETTY

Lagarde is facing trial in France over her handling of a £340million state handout to a business man

The IMF’s moral authority has been shredded further by the endless controversies that have embroiled its managing directors. Lagarde herself stoked outrage in 2012 when she dared to lecture the Greeks about tax avoidance, despite the fact that she paid no tax at all on her £300,000 salary because of her status as an international diplomat. She is now facing trial in France over her handling of a massive £340million state handout to a controversial businessman and supporter of her party.

Her predecessor, the bullish French socialist Dominique Strauss-Kahn, had his reputation destroyed by a series of infamous sex scandals. Rodrigo Rato, the IMF chief before Strauss-Kahn, is also now on trial in Spain over charges that he amassed a vast fortune through fraud and tax evasion while at Spanish bank Bankia. From 2010 Bankia was turning in massive losses even as it claimed a healthy profit.

Such epic flight from reality could almost be a metaphor for the useless IMF.

SOURCE:-( http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/691731/No-surprise-IMF-got-wrong-predictions-Brexit-economy )

 

 

 

Jeremy’s Challenge!

I would like to make one point very clear… I hate “politics”, in principle.
In my opinion “Political Parties” are a waste of effort, time, money, resources, etc.

A BETTER system is where the people choose experts in their fields to manage or administrate their areas of proven expertise, dispensing with the whole “political system” (and the “parties”) in it’s entirety.

HOWEVER, in a system that hasn’t changed in centuries, when there is a real possibility of CHANGING that system, then I will get behind it, ESPECIALLY if that change is for the betterment of the people.

Jeremy Corbyn is the ONLY political person on the radar in the UK today who is advocating fundamental change, bringing things back to “the people first”.

Now, the Bliarites are mounting their official campaign to oust him with their candidate, Angela Eagle. We had hoped that they had backed off, however the political intrigues of “dirty politics” have not given up apparently. (More worms to crawl out of the woodwork now!)

Worst case scenario: Is that the National Executive Committee of the Labour Party, who decide the Labour Party’s “rules”, decide that Jeremy must have a nomination of 50 members of parliament to stand, as opposed to automatically being on the ballot as the incumbent leader! (In this case it would be already over, before the voting has even begun!)

If this proves the case, then we will have a continuation of a Bliarite Labour Party in Parliament = in effect NO “opposition” to the Conservatives and “back to the usual” same old same old!

If this proves the case then I would recommend that the entirely new political movement, “Momentum”, becomes a new political party in politics!

The Labour liars and the Conservatives would BOTH be wiped out in the next general election in this case, IF the country manages to survive that far! At the very least the electorate will wreak their vengeance on those who turned against the leader THEY elected, Jeremy, and the Labour Party will be decimated, as is what happened the LAST time a sitting leader was ousted (Ramsey MacDonald).

At least the elites will be happy won’t they?

There is so much more I COULD post, but you can search and find it for yourself. There is PLENTY out there, including “a doozy” where Dennis Skinner was interviewed by the BBC and then “the reporter” spun his answers in closing, while Dennis was still present, and he exposed it right there and then on camera and she had to say she was “just joking”. He walked off in disgust! (Typical BBC!!! – SUPPOSED to be owned by the people, they pay for it, but ACTUALLY owned by “the usual suspects”!!!)

Still to come… how the banksters profited from Brexit!

Anyway, more for your perusal…

The Intercept

Photo: Virginia Mayo/AP

Brexit Is Only the Latest Proof of the Insularity and Failure of Western Establishment Institutions

Glenn Greenwald
June 25 2016,

THE DECISION BY U.K. voters to leave the EU is such a glaring repudiation of the wisdom and relevance of elite political and media institutions that — for once — their failures have become a prominent part of the storyline. Media reaction to the Brexit vote falls into two general categories: (1) earnest, candid attempts to understand what motivated voters to make this choice, even if that means indicting their own establishment circles, and (2) petulant, self-serving, simple-minded attacks on disobedient pro-Leave voters for being primitive, xenophobic bigots (and stupid to boot), all to evade any reckoning with their own responsibility. Virtually every reaction that falls into the former category emphasizes the profound failures of Western establishment factions; these institutions have spawned pervasive misery and inequality, only to spew condescending scorn at their victims when they object.

The Los Angeles Times’s Vincent Bevins, in an outstanding and concise analysis, wrote that “both Brexit and Trumpism are the very, very wrong answers to legitimate questions that urban elites have refused to ask for 30 years”; in particular, “since the 1980s the elites in rich countries have overplayed their hand, taking all the gains for themselves and just covering their ears when anyone else talks, and now they are watching in horror as voters revolt.” The British journalist Tom Ewing, in a comprehensive Brexit explanation, said the same dynamic driving the U.K. Vote prevails in Europe and North America as well: “the arrogance of neoliberal elites in constructing a politics designed to sideline and work around democracy while leaving democracy formally intact.”

In an interview with the New Statesman, the political philosopher Michael Sandel also said that the dynamics driving the pro-Brexit sentiment were now dominant throughout the West generally: “A large constituency of working-class voters feel that not only has the economy left them behind, but so has the culture, that the sources of their dignity, the dignity of labor, have been eroded and mocked by developments with globalization, the rise of finance, the attention that is lavished by parties across the political spectrum on economic and financial elites, the technocratic emphasis of the established political parties.” After the market-venerating radicalism of Reagan and Thatcher, he said, “the center left” — Blair and Clinton and various European parties — “managed to regain political office but failed to reimagine the mission and purpose of social democracy, which became empty and obsolete.”

Three Guardian writers sounded similar themes about elite media ignorance stemming from homogeneity and detachment from the citizenry. John Harris quoted a Manchester voter as explaining, “If you’ve got money, you vote in. If you haven’t got money, you vote out.” Harris added: “Most of the media … failed to see this coming. … The alienation of the people charged with documenting the national mood from the people who actually define it is one of the ruptures that has led to this moment.” Gary Younge similarly denounced “a section of the London-based commentariat [that] anthropologized the British working class as though they were a lesser evolved breed from distant parts, all too often portraying them as bigots who did not know what was good for them.” Ian Jack’s article was headlined “In this Brexit vote, the poor turned on an elite who ignored them,” and he described how “gradually the sight of empty towns and shuttered shops became normalized or forgotten.” Headlines like this one from The Guardian in 2014 were prescient but largely ignored:

Though there were some exceptions, establishment political and media elites in the U.K. were vehemently united against Brexit, but their decreed wisdom was ignored, even scorned. That has happened time and again. As their fundamental failures become more evident to all, these elites have lost credibility, influence, and the ability to dictate outcomes.

Just last year in the U.K., Labour members chose someone to lead Tony Blair’s party — the authentically left-wing Jeremy Corbyn — who could not have been more intensely despised and patronized by almost every leading light of the British media and political class. In the U.S., the joyful rejection by Trump voters of the collective wisdom of the conservative establishment evidenced the same contempt for elite consensus. The enthusiastic and sustained rallying, especially by young voters, against beloved-by-the-establishment Hillary Clinton in favor of a 74-year-old socialist taken seriously by almost no D.C. elites reflected the same dynamic. Elite denunciations of the right-wing parties of Europe fall on deaf ears. Elites can’t stop, or even affect, any of these movements because they are, at bottom, revolts against their wisdom, authority, and virtue.

IN SUM, THE West’s establishment credibility is dying, and its influence is precipitously eroding — all deservedly so. The frenetic pace of online media makes even the most recent events feel distant, like ancient history. That, in turn, makes it easy to lose sight of how many catastrophic and devastating failures Western elites have produced in a remarkably short period of time.

In 2003, U.S. and British elites joined together to advocate one of the most heinous and immoral aggressive wars in decades: the destruction of Iraq; that it turned out to be centrally based on falsehoods that were ratified by the most trusted institutions, as well as a complete policy failure even on its own terms, gutted public trust.

In 2008, their economic worldview and unrestrained corruption precipitated a global economic crisis that literally caused, and is still causing, billions of people to suffer — in response, they quickly protected the plutocrats who caused the crisis while leaving the victimized masses to cope with the generational fallout. Even now, Western elites continue to proselytize markets and impose free trade and globalization without the slightest concern for the vast inequality and destruction of economic security those policies generate.

In 2011, NATO bombed Libya by pretending it was motivated by humanitarianism, only to ignore that country once the fun military triumph was celebrated, thus leaving a vacuum of anarchy and militia rule for years that spread instability through the region and fueled the refugee crisis. The U.S. and its European allies continue to invade, occupy, and bomb predominantly Muslim countries while propping up their most brutal tyrants, then feign befuddlement about why anyone would want to attack them back, justifying erosions of basic liberties and more bombing campaigns and ratcheting up fear levels each time someone does. The rise of ISIS and the foothold it seized in Iraq and Libya were the direct byproducts of the West’s military actions (as even Tony Blair admitted regarding Iraq). Western societies continue to divert massive resources into military weaponry and prisons for their citizens, enriching the most powerful factions in the process, all while imposing harsh austerity on already suffering masses. In sum, Western elites thrive while everyone else loses hope.

These are not random, isolated mistakes. They are the byproduct of fundamental cultural pathologies within Western elite circles — a deep rot. Why should institutions that have repeatedly authored such travesties, and spread such misery, continue to command respect and credibility? They shouldn’t, and they’re not. As Chris Hayes warned in his 2012 book Twilight of the Elites, “Given both the scope and depth of this distrust [in elite institutions], it’s clear that we’re in the midst of something far grander and more perilous than just a crisis of government or a crisis of capitalism. We are in the midst of a broad and devastating crisis of authority.”

It’s natural — and inevitable — that malignant figures will try to exploit this vacuum of authority. All sorts of demagogues and extremists will try to redirect mass anger for their own ends. Revolts against corrupt elite institutions can usher in reform and progress, but they can also create a space for the ugliest tribal impulses: xenophobia, authoritarianism, racism, fascism. One sees all of that, both good and bad, manifesting in the anti-establishment movements throughout the U.S., Europe, and the U.K. — including Brexit. All of this can be invigorating, or promising, or destabilizing, or dangerous: most likely a combination of all that.

The solution is not to subserviently cling to corrupt elite institutions out of fear of the alternatives. It is, instead, to help bury those institutions and their elite mavens and then fight for superior replacements. As Hayes put it in his book, the challenge is “directing the frustration, anger, and alienation we all feel into building a trans-ideological coalition that can actually dislodge the power of the post-meritocratic elite. One that marshals insurrectionist sentiment without succumbing to nihilism and manic, paranoid distrust.”

Corrupt elites always try to persuade people to continue to submit to their dominance in exchange for protection from forces that are even worse. That’s their game. But at some point, they themselves, and their prevailing order, become so destructive, so deceitful, so toxic, that their victims are willing to gamble that the alternatives will not be worse, or at least, they decide to embrace the satisfaction of spitting in the faces of those who have displayed nothing but contempt and condescension for them.

There is no single, unifying explanation for Brexit, Trumpism, or the growing extremism of various stripes throughout the West, but this sense of angry impotence — an inability to see any option other than smashing those responsible for their plight — is undoubtedly a major factor. As Bevins put it, supporters of Trump, Brexit, and other anti-establishment movements “are motivated not so much by whether they think the projects will actually work, but more by their desire to say FUCK YOU” to those they believe (with very good reason) have failed them.

Obviously, those who are the target of this anti-establishment rage — political, economic, and media elites — are desperate to exonerate themselves, to demonstrate that they bear no responsibility for the suffering masses that are now refusing to be compliant and silent. The easiest course to achieve that goal is simply to demonize those with little power, wealth, or possibility as stupid and racist: This is only happening because they are primitive and ignorant and hateful, not because they have any legitimate grievances or because I or my friends or my elite institutions have done anything wrong. As Vice’s Michael Tracey put it:

Elites' reaction to Brexit mimics their reaction to Trump: blame the amorality of ordinary people rather than reckon with elite failure

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) June 24, 2016

Because that reaction is so self-protective and self-glorifying, many U.S. media elites — including those who knew almost nothing about Brexit until 48 hours ago — instantly adopted it as their preferred narrative for explaining what happened, just as they’ve done with Trump, Corbyn, Sanders, and any number of other instances where their entitlement to rule has been disregarded. They are so persuaded of their own natural superiority that any factions who refuse to see it and submit to it prove themselves, by definition, to be regressive, stunted, and amoral.

INDEED, MEDIA REACTION to the Brexit vote — filled with unreflective rage, condescension, and contempt toward those who voted wrong — perfectly illustrates the dynamics that caused all of this in the first place. Media elites, by virtue of their position, adore the status quo. It rewards them, vests them with prestige and position, welcomes them into exclusive circles, allows them to be close to (if not wield) great power while traveling their country and the world, provides them with a platform, and fills them with esteem and purpose. The same is true of academic elites, financial elites, and political elites. Elites love the status quo that has given them, and then protected, their elite position.

Elites are usually elite for good reason, and tend to have better judgment than the average person. #confessyourunpopularopinion

— Josh Barro (@jbarro) December 4, 2013

Because of how generally satisfied they are with their lot, they regard with affection and respect the internationalist institutions that safeguard the West’s prevailing order: the World Bank and IMF, NATO and the West’s military forces, the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, the EU. While they express some piecemeal criticisms of each, they literally cannot comprehend how anyone would be fundamentally disillusioned by and angry with these institutions, let alone want to break from them. They are far removed from the suffering that causes those anti-establishment sentiments. So they search and search in vain for some rationale that could explain something like Brexit — or the establishment-condemning movements on the right and left — and can find only one way to process it: These people are not motivated by any legitimate grievances or economic suffering, but instead they are just broken, ungrateful, immoral, hateful, racist, and ignorant.

Of course, it is the case that some, perhaps much of the support given to these anti-establishment movements is grounded in those sorts of ugly sentiments. But it’s also the case that the media elites’ revered establishment institutions in finance, media, and politics are driven by all sorts of equally ugly impulses, as the rotted fruit of their actions conclusively proves.

Even more important, the mechanism that Western citizens are expected to use to express and rectify dissatisfaction — elections — has largely ceased to serve any corrective function. As Hayes, in a widely cited tweet, put it this week about Brexit:

I don't want a future in which politics is primarily a battle between cosmopolitan finance capitalism and ethno-nationalist backlash.

— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) June 24, 2016

But that is exactly the choice presented not only by Brexit but also Western elections generally, including the 2016 Clinton v. Trump general election (just look at the powerful array of Wall Street tycoons and war-loving neocons that — long before Trump — viewed the former Democratic New York senator and secretary of state as their best hope for having their agenda and interests served). When democracy is preserved only in form, structured to change little to nothing about power distribution, people naturally seek alternatives for the redress of their grievances, particularly when they suffer.

More importantly still — and directly contrary to what establishment liberals love to claim in order to demonize all who reject their authority — economic suffering and xenophobia/racism are not mutually exclusive. The opposite is true: The former fuels the latter, as sustained economic misery makes people more receptive to tribalistic scapegoating. That’s precisely why plutocratic policies that deprive huge portions of the population of basic opportunity and hope are so dangerous. Claiming that supporters of Brexit or Trump or Corbyn or Sanders or anti-establishment European parties on the left and right are motivated only by hatred but not genuine economic suffering and political oppression is a transparent tactic for exonerating status quo institutions and evading responsibility for doing anything about their core corruption.

Part of this spiteful media reaction to Brexit is grounded in a dreary combination of sloth and habit: A sizable portion of the establishment liberal commentariat in the West has completely lost the ability to engage with any sort of dissent from its orthodoxies or even understand those who disagree. They are capable of nothing beyond adopting the smuggest, most self-satisfied posture, then spouting clichés to dismiss their critics as ignorant, benighted bigots. Like the people of the West who bomb Muslim countries and then express confusion that anyone wants to attack them back, the most simple-minded of these establishment media liberals are constantly enraged that the people they endlessly malign as ignorant haters refuse to vest them with the respect and credibility to which they are naturally entitled.

BUT THERE’S SOMETHING deeper and more interesting driving the media reaction here. Establishment journalistic outlets are not outsiders. They’re the opposite: They are fully integrated into elite institutions, are tools of those institutions, and thus identify fully with them. Of course they do not share, and cannot understand, anti-establishment sentiments: They are the targets of this establishment-hating revolt as much as anyone else. These journalists’ reaction to this anti-establishment backlash is a form of self-defense. As NYU journalism professor Jay Rosen put it last night, “Journalists today report on hostility to the political class, as if they had nothing to do with it,” but they are a key part of that political class and, for that reason, “if the population — or part of it — is in revolt against the political class, this is a problem for journalism.”

There are many factors explaining why establishment journalists now have almost no ability to stem the tide of anti-establishment rage, even when it’s irrational and driven by ignoble impulses. Part of it is that the internet and social media have rendered them irrelevant, unnecessary to disseminate ideas. Part of it is that they have nothing to say to people who are suffering and angry — due to their distance from them — other than to scorn them as hateful losers. Part of it is that journalists — like anyone else — tend to react with bitterness and rage, not self-assessment, as they lose influence and stature.

But a major factor is that many people recognize that establishment journalists are an integral part of the very institutions and corrupted elite circles that are authors of their plight. Rather than mediating or informing these political conflicts, journalists are agents of the forces that are oppressing people. And when journalists react to their anger and suffering by telling them that it’s invalid and merely the byproduct of their stupidity and primitive resentments, that only reinforces the perception that journalists are their enemy, thus rendering journalistic opinion increasingly irrelevant.

Brexit was a tantrum — British voters had good reason to be angry, but what they did won't make anything better. https://t.co/41AIMdVTv8

— Josh Barro (@jbarro) June 24, 2016

Brexit — despite all the harm it is likely to cause and all the malicious politicians it will empower — could have been a positive development. But that would require that elites (and their media outlets) react to the shock of this repudiation by spending some time reflecting on their own flaws, analyzing what they have done to contribute to such mass outrage and deprivation, in order to engage in course correction. Exactly the same potential opportunity was created by the Iraq debacle, the 2008 financial crisis, the rise of Trumpism and other anti-establishment movements: This is all compelling evidence that things have gone very wrong with those who wield the greatest power, that self-critique in elite circles is more vital than anything.

Anyone who cares about European project should stop blaming capricious/emotional voters & take seriously the EU's many fundamental problems.

— Taniel (@Taniel) June 24, 2016

But, as usual, that’s exactly what they most refuse to do. Instead of acknowledging and addressing the fundamental flaws within themselves, they are devoting their energies to demonizing the victims of their corruption, all in order to delegitimize those grievances and thus relieve themselves of responsibility to meaningfully address them. That reaction only serves to bolster, if not vindicate, the animating perceptions that these elite institutions are hopelessly self-interested, toxic, and destructive and thus cannot be reformed but rather must be destroyed. That, in turn, only ensures there will be many more Brexits, and Trumps, in our collective future.

Bravo Brexit!

 

At long last the tyranny of the global financial elite has been slammed good and hard.

You can count on them to attempt another central bank based shock and awe campaign to halt and reverse the current sell-off, but it won’t be credible, sustainable or maybe even possible.

The central bankers and their compatriots at the EU, IMF, White House/Treasury, OECD, G-7 and the rest of the Bubble Finance apparatus have well and truly over-played their hand.

They have created a tissue of financial lies; an affront to the very laws of markets, sound money and capitalist prosperity.

After all, what predicate of sober economics could possibly justify $10 trillion of sovereign debt trading at negative yields?

Or a stock market trading at 24X reported earnings in the face of a faltering global economy and a tepid domestic US business cycle expansion which at 84 months is already long in the tooth and showing signs of recession everywhere?

And that’s to say nothing of the endless ranks of insanely over-valued “story” stocks like Valeant was and the megalomaniacal visions of Elon Musk still are.

So there will be payback, clawback and traumatic deflation of the bubbles. Plenty of it, as far as the eye can see.

On the immediate matter of Brexit, the British people have rejected the arrogant rule of the EU superstate and the tyranny of its unelected courts, commissions and bureaucratic overlords.

As Donald Trump was quick to point out, they have taken back their country.

He urges that Americans do the same, and he might just persuade them.

But whether Trumpism captures the White House or not, it is virtually certain that Brexit is a contagious political disease.

In response to today’s history-shaking event, determined campaigns for Frexit, Spexit, NExit, Grexit, Italxit, Hungexit and more centrifugal political emissions will next follow.

Smaller government—–at least in geography—–is being given another chance. And that’s a very good thing because more localized democracy everywhere and always is inimical to the rule of centralized financial elites.

The combustible material for more referendums and defections from the EU is certainly available in surging populist parties of both the left and the right throughout the continent.

In fact, the next hammer blow to the Brussels/German dictatorship will surely happen in Spain’s general election do-over on Sunday (the December elections resulted in paralysis and no government).

When the polls close, the repudiation of the corrupt, hypocritical lapdog government of Prime Minister Rajoy will surely be complete. And properly so; he was just another statist in conservative garb who reformed nothing, left the Spanish economy buried in debt and gave false witness to the notion that the Brussels bureaucrats are the saviors of Europe.

So the common people of Europe may be doubly blessed this week with the exit of both David Cameron and Mariano Rajoy. Good riddance to both.

Spain's Mariano Rajoy and Britain's David Cameron in September 2015

At the same time, the anti-Brussels parties of both the left (Podemos) and the right (Ciudadanos) are certain to make further gains. But even then, Spanish politics will remain splintered and paralyzed. There will emerge no government strong enough or willing enough to execute Brussels’s inevitable dictates in the event that drastically over-valued Spanish bond market goes into a tailspin and requires another EU intervention.

And that’s the next leg of the Brexit storm.

To wit, sovereign bond prices throughout Europe have been lifted artificially skyward by the financial snake-charmers of Brussels and the ECB. The massive rally in Spain’s 10-year bond after Draghi’s “whatever it takes” ukase was not due to Spain becoming more credit worthy or the fact that its unemployment rate has dropped from 26% to a mere 20%.

The whole plunge of yields from 7% to a low of 1% about a year ago was due to a front-runners’ stampede. That is, the fast money crowd was buying on repo what the ECB promised to take off their hands at ever higher prices in due course. They were shooting the proverbial ducks in a barrel.

But as global “risk-off” gathers worldwide momentum, look-out below. There will be no incremental bid from Frankfurt for a flood of carry trade unwinds. That’s because the ECB will soon be embroiled in an existential crisis as the centrifugal forces unleashed by Brexit tear apart the fragile consensus on which Draghi’s lunatic monetary experiments depended.

In particular, the populist political insurgencies throughout Europe are as much anti-German as they are anti-immigrant. It is only a matter of time before German acquiesce in the ECB’s massive bond buying campaign—–which essentially bails out the rest of Europe—–will be abruptly ended by an internal revolt against Merkelite accommodation.

Spain Government Bond 10Y

Moreover, Spain is by no means unique. Italy’s Five-Star movement, which just came from winning 9 out of 10 mayoral contests including Rome, will surely now be energized mightily. Its Northern League ally has already called for a referendum on exiting the euro.

Needless to say, Italy’s fiscal circumstance is far more dire than even Spain’s. The likelihood that its 10-year bonds are money good at last week’s 135 basis points of yield are between slim and none. Either the threat of an exit or a 5-Star/populist coalition government would send the front-runners who scarfed up Italy’s bonds running for the hills.

Since Italy owes upward of $2 trillion on it government accounts alone, its bond market is an explosion waiting to happen. And that means its bedraggled banks are, too.

That’s because one feature of the Draghi Ponzi was that national banks in the peripheral nations started buying up their own country’s rapidly appreciating sovereign debt  hand-over-fist. Italy’s banks own upwards of $400 billion of Italian government debt.

That’s the one and same Italian government that cannot possibly cope with its existing 135% debt to GDP ratio. And that’s also before the populists take power and are forced to bailout the country’s already insolvent banking system. The latter will suffer from a shock of capital and depositor flight after the current government falls(soon), and Prime Minister Renzi joins Cameron and Rajoy at some establishment rehab center for the deposed.

Italy Government Bond 10Y

During the last financial crisis our elite rulers cried financial “contagion”. That scary story generated panic among the politicians and acquiescence in their crooked regime of massive bailouts and relentless money pumping.

The effect of was to bailout the gamblers from the Greenspan/Bernanke housing and credit bubble, and then to shower unspeakable windfalls on the 1% as the central banks reflated an even more monumental bubble during the regime of QE, ZIRP and NIRP.

But now the world’s financial rulers are going to be on the receiving end of an even more virulent and far-reaching political contagion. That is, a tidal wave of voter demands to emulate the British people and take back their countries and their governments from the financial elites and politicians like Cameron who are their bagmen.

This time populist and insurgent politicians are not going to roll-over for the rule of unelected central bankers and the international financial apparatchiks of the IMF and related institutions.

In that context, it can be confidently said that the Eurozone and ECB are finished. That’s because the monstrously inflated euro-bond market that Draghi created will implode if the front-running speculators lose confidence in the scheme.

At length, it will become evident that Draghi’s “whatever it takes” gambit was the single most foolish act in the history of central banking. It assumed that the rule of the financial elite was limitless and endless.

Brexit proves that both assumptions are wrong. Now every nook and cranny of the world’s bloated and radically mispriced financial casinos will face the same shock to confidence.

Central bankers everywhere will be on the run. Just in the nick of time.

The Final War for Planet Earth Pits

the Globalists Against the

Nationalists

 

WAR OF THE TITANS:
Globalists vs Nationalists


By Anonymous Patriots
State of the Nation Exclusive

16/06/16

We have to tell you what Drudge Report cannot. The war is not Isis vs. Gays, Christians, or Americans.   World War III, a war that has been with us since many of us have been alive, is the war of the Globalists vs the Nationalists.  Fellow patriots, if we are going to win WWIII, we have to know precisely who the enemy is.

Our Enemy is Globalism

This enemy wants to destroy your country and all nations around the world; they are the Globalists. You are not new to this site, so you know exactly who we are referencing. They are the people who run the Bilderberger Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Federal Reserve, United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Bank of International Settlements, World Bank, Knights of Malta, Central Banks, offshore tax havens, Warlord Bankers, the Black Nobility, the City of London, the Bank of England, the Vatican Bank, and many other dark brotherhoods.

Who are the Globalists Fighting?

The Globalists are fighting the Nationalists, not only in the United States, but in the United Kingdom, Australia, Venezuela, England, the European Union, all around the world.  Anywhere the Globalists can destroy national cultures, borders, language, economies, currencies, natural resources and basically, anything of value, they do so to create a cultural of chaos to capitalize on opportunism. War fills the pockets of Globalists who gut nations and bleed their economies of cash and shelter it in offshore accounts.  

When we say Globalists, we are speaking about a very small group of people who are the principal stockholders in every national central bank throughout the world.  They are also the principal stockholders in the top multi-national industries who always get military contracts. The Military-Industrial Complex is owned by the same people who own the central banks – Globalists, or what we sometimes called transnationalists.  

This small group of transnational Globalists provoke war to create an income stream to support their cabal.  Developing countries take out loans from these banksters, just to find their country can never pay back their war masters.

This is neo-feudalism, or the New World Order, that the Globalists are creating for us:

bbb9

They also make the weapons for both sides and profit double there also.  War is the biggest “business” on the planet and only a handful of bankster families benefit. The blood your sons spill on the battlefield, the interest rates you pay to survive, the homes and assets that they seize from you, the moms and dads that were murdered in the World Trade Towers are the fodder these bankster families need to keep up their grand Ponzi scheme and put all of us in the chains of debt slavery.  

To achieve their goal of total world domination, their agenda is simple:

  1. Destroy all nations and unite under one world government, religion, and military.
  2. Depopulate the enemy (that’s us folks) through forced vaccinations, poisoned food (irradiated, GMOs, filled with deadly chemicals), and chemtrails full of poisons sprayed down on us like we are insects and rodents to be exterminated.
  3. Keep us uneducated and uniformed. From fluoridating the water to substandard education, to mainstream media propaganda and revisionist history—all have been in play for decades to make sure the enemy (that’s us folks) can’t think clearly.
  4. Keep the enemy (that’s us folks) off balance with their propaganda war machine, their criminal banking system, fixed elections, spiraling debt and inflation, broken educational system, crumbling infrastructure, bad trade deals, UN created laws, fake diseases, etc.  

In this way most people can’t even think thoughts that would lead them to understand that the government is responsible for false flag attacks that put FEAR into the population; that the government is responsible for not filling the EBT cards of the poor so that they could be weaponized to riot as George Soros’ paid armies on the street; that the government is responsible for turning over American sovereignty to the Globalist enemy through illegal executive actions, false debt owed to the Federal Reserve, a rigged banking system, gambling on Wall Street, creation of fraudulent derivatives, corporate theft, weaponizing the Internet, pervasive surveillance of all aspects of American life, destruction of the Bill of Rights via the Patriot Act, and the willful theft of the rights given to American citizens through the Constitution of the United States.

Their Modus Operandi

ISIS: a creation of the Globalists to terrorize citizens of the world starting with George W. Bush and Rumsfeld’s creation of Al-Qaeda through to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry’s creation, funding and protection of ISIS.  ISIS is Obama’s ally.  Obama, who can’t even say “Muslim terrorists,” has been funding ISIS and calling them “friendly rebels” who have the same interests as US policy in Syria, Iraq and the Levant.

Know how to spot a Globalist? Ask them to say “radical Islamic terrorism” or “Muslim terrorist.” They can’t and they won’t. Because these are their ground soldiers doing the dirty work of global war that the Kissingers, Windsors, Bushes, Clintons, Merkels, et al cannot do themselves.   

They are deliberately starving the poor in the cities this year to escalate the summer of riots. First earlier this year they started by withholding tax credit refunds of the poor without first presenting proper receipt documentation at an IRS field office. The next play started at the beginning of June when EBT cards were not loaded with funds. Then they go in with their Craigslist ads offering $15/hour to participate in anti-Trump rallies.   

Worldwide terror is a global form of war against the citizens of all nations. WWIII is not like a war of the past with geographical and national delineations of who is an enemy or ally. The Globalists operate within all areas of the government in all countries.

The United Nations is the Hub of Globalism: Take Down the UN and We Defeat the Globalists

Since space aliens did not arrive to help do the job of uniting US vs THEM, thereby creating an immediate need for the entire world to come together in a one world community to defend humanity against extraterrestrial invaders, ISIS was manufactured so that all nations could unite against a common enemy.  

Additionally, Globalists are creating the narrative of terrorism around the world, forcing nations to believe in the terror of ISIS and then surrender.  The U.S. Federal Government and its 17 agencies, that all answer to the president in matters concerning “national security”, are allowed to wage war against Americans on their own soil.  Terrorism is not exclusive to radical ideologies and theocracies but is also bred and perpetrated against Americans by traitors to the U.S. Constitution and the United States who are transnational Globalists.  

Who Are the Nationalists?

Who are the vocal patriots, the Nationalists that are doing their best to fight the Globalists?  On the U.S. national level, Senators Jeff Sessions and Rand Paul stand out as great patriots in our war against the Globalists. Both are leaders in Congress who have a track record of fighting the Globalists. In a recent email plea to all citizens Rand Paul urged Americans to wake up to the danger of Congress passing the UN Small Arms Treaty:

United Nations’ Small Arms Treaty Poses Direct Threat to the Constitution

Jeff Sessions warns us: “This election is our last chance to save U.S. sovereignty and to end the domination of the political establishment over the interests of working Americans.”

Who Really Owns and Controls the Military-Industrial Complex? Part II

Both of these patriots would serve us well as vice president or cabinet members in a Trump administration. And to be sure, the Globalists would not want to bring harm to Trump if either Sessions or Paul would be the next president.

The UN Military is the Globalist’s Military

Using U.S. funding for years, the United Nations has built an army that is hiding in plain sight all across America through the UN Safe Cities Initiative.  Jade Helm 2015 and Cascadian Rising 2016 were tactical exercises that hid the disbursement of UN heavy military equipment throughout American and especially to all major cities. There have even been multiple military and FEMA exercises that used multi-national troops on US soil.

This UN military equipment and UN presence in America is starting to have a more active role in our city streets as “unrest” is rising and summer riots predicted by the White House.   The average “dumbed-down” American doesn’t notice notice the UN’s military presence on U.S. soil or that the UN Small Arms Treaty has already been enforced in many nations that signed the treaty.  

UN troops have already come into those nations to help “round up” the guns and make sure there is no resistance from the citizens.  It is critical for the Globalist WWIII victory that all citizens in the U. S. be disarmed and placed under UN military control.

The Weapons Being Used Against Us

We have written extensively about this and if you haven’t read these articles, you are putting your head in the sand. Arming yourself with this knowledge is as important as having a gun or two in your home these days.

False Flags are Legal Propaganda Produced by the Department of Defense

Who Really Owns and Controls the Military-Industrial Complex PART ONE

Who Really Owns and Controls the Military-Industrial Complex PART TWO

What Does This Have to do with the Orlando Shootings

We just completed an article regarding the Orlando shooting and how it has all of the components of a False Flag event:

Orlando Shootings: Another B-Grade Production by the Bureau of Broadcast Governors

There are Nationalists within our country who are trying to defeat the Globalists using the very techniques that they are using against us – propaganda that creates narratives to support Nationalism.

Let’s take the Orlando slaughter of Christina Grimmie on June 10, 2016. We see the Globalist fingerprints all over this murder. They weaponized a killer who fit their narrative—a white, male gunman who committed suicide after the event. Sounds like the Uber driver in Kalamazoo, Michigan who just went out and shot people because his Uber dispatcher was controlling his mind through his cell phone – according to him.

Kalamazoo driver blamed Uber app for shooting rampage

We believe that this is an example of the weaponization of susceptible people who have been found to be easily controlled. These occurrences are increasing in number and the shooters who don’t commit suicide often say they were told to kill themselves but they couldn’t do it because of religious beliefs.  Religious narrative networks are the most powerful and the hardest to override with subliminal programming and brainwashing.

In many of the new cases of people going uncontrollably crazy and killing people, the blood work shows they were not on drugs or alcohol and had no prior record of mental illness.  People are becoming homicidal and suicidal without any prior history of violence, drugs, or military training.

 

The Orlando shooter supposedly, according to the FBI narrative, just recently became angry seeing two men kiss in public and this became the “motive” for the killings according to the FBI reports.  No one in their right mind could possibly believe such shallow nonsense, but it was sold to an unwitting public like cheap Hollywood entertainment.  

Due to the dumbing down of the “sheeple” of America via fluoridated water, high fructose corn syrup, GMO food, vaccination and chemtrail poisoning, Common Core curriculum, and the plethora of methods of subliminal brainwashing – few noticed or asked about such stupid motives for shooting over one hundred people.  

The message from the Nationalists, who made sure the shooter was committed to ISIS, was very clear in pointing at Muslim terrorism and the agenda to secure the borders and take the fight to ISIS on their own turf.  The scenario of a white shooter killing a Christian singer was a Globalist agenda item showing that anyone can be weaponized and turned into a killer; no one is safe, so all guns need to be confiscated.  

The shooter and the victim fit the narrative of the Globalists: “Guns kill Christians.” Then in complete fear, Christians will urge Congress to pass gun control laws and fall lock and step into the UN Small Arms Treaty strategy. The additional benefit is that Christians, who largely support the candidacy of Donald Trump, would change their allegiance to the Globalist Hillary Clinton who wants all guns confiscated from Americans and no borders to exist within 100 days of her administration.  This strategy is known as “killing two birds with one bullet.”

But what really happened was MURDER, plain and simple.

Now, four days later, the Nationalists use the same methodology as the Globalists have been using for many years: FALSE FLAGS. The most prominent one being Sandy Hook, but another was San Bernardino (at least the part where three white men were alleged to have killed the attendees at the party held at the Inland Regional Center event).

So the Nationalists say, “Two can play this game.” And they stage their own false flag event and disrupt any that they know the Globalists are planning.

But the Nationalists have a different narrative they want to establish and, not to be outdone by the Globalists, they make sure that their shooting is so big and heinous that the death of Christina Grimmie fades into the Internet and the short-term memory of dimwitted Americans.

The gunman and victims of the Orlando “massacre” fit the narrative for the Nationalists: “ISIS kills Gays”.  Again, we have “two birds with one bullet.”

The net result is that gays (LBGT community) and many other Americans go out and buy guns and put more calls into their congressional representatives to protect the Second Amendment, pushing the globalist agenda of the UN Small Arms Treaty further into oblivion.  And, the LGBT community that are #NeverHillary followers might vote for Trump in order to keep Hillary, the Globalist, from her final global play: total annihilation of the United States as an independent nation.  

Just like Sandy Hook where no children died, we should take comfort that no LGBTers were murdered at the Orlando night club. Perhaps only the Muslim patsy died, or at least that is what we are told by the “official narrative.” Perhaps no one died.

Will Obama Cry Really Big, Big Tears For The Murdered Victims of Orlando?  

The Globalists told Obama early on that his main objective in the transformation of America was to disarm all Americans. He must come to deliver the UN Small Arms Treaty deal before he leaves office.  The Sandy Hook staged event was staged after the U.S. Congress made it legal through NDAA to propagandize and terrorize U. S. citizens.  

Obama failed.  Too many of us didn’t fall for the narrative. So then the Globalists within the U.S. government put together the false flag event in San Bernardino. You know the story. Three white gunman entered the Inland Regional Center and killed a room full of people. Or at least that was the official story first released and supported by multiple eye witnesses.

No, no…that’s not what happened. Excuse me. It was two Muslims, Tashfeen Malik and Syed Rizwan Farook, that slaughtered a roomful of people.  We know this for sure because one, that’s right, just one single witness said he was told by the dying person in his arms that she positively identified Syed and Tashfeen as the shooters even though they were both wearing face masks and SWAT gear that covered their bodies.

Well folks, that’s what happened when the Nationalists found out what the Globalists were doing in San Bernardino and out-trumped them with inserting Muslims as the killers to promote their own narrative – the now famous “False Flag within a False Flag.”  Or the first time we all saw the two sides in open battle with one another: Globalists vs Nationalists.

While the Globalists were planning their false flag narrative that would sway the public to ban guns because of the evil deeds of “three white men” with assault weapons, the Nationalists were setting up the Muslim patsies for their own narrative: Radicalized Islamists kill Americans.  

The Nationalists won the propaganda battle in San Bernardino and Americans continued to put pressure on Congress to back away from Second Amendment limitations.

We can then imagine that Henry Kissinger and the Globalist cabals called Obama to the woodshed for a serious talk about his inability to get guns taken away from Americans. Obama had nothing left in his play book, except crocodile tears, which is exactly what happened next as he cried for gun control measures on the eve of the congressional vote to ban long guns and create federal gun regulations for all 50 states – overturning States rights and the Second Amendment.

The video links below shows Obama crying for the supposed victims on January 5, 2016, just after the San Bernardino shootings and before Congress overturned the gun control legislation he so desperately desired.

Obama Crying About Victims of Gun Violence After San Bernardino False Flag

But crocodile tears were not new to Obama the Globalist-step-n-fetch it. Here he is crying just after the Sandy Hook (no children died) victims.

President Obama Tears Up Over the Sandy Hook Hoax

Let’s see how long it takes Obama to cry over the Orlando victims.  Of course, he won’t because he, like any devout Globalist, he cannot speak the term “radical Islamic terrorism.”

No Tears for LGBT Community

It is doubtful that Obama will make a speech, cry or acknowledge that radical Islamic terrorism had anything to do with this “hate crime.”  He will ignore the Nationalist’s (probably a faction of the FBI) insertion of a Muslim patsy because it does not work to disarm Americans. In fact, gun sales for pink pistols are probably exploding right now.

The Globalist (probably a faction of the CIA) might have seemed to have won the day with the first four killings around Orlando during this last week-end, but the clear message of the Nationalists is the one that was heard and will be remembered – radicalized Muslim ISIS member kills lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals, and transgenders on U.S. soil.  

So what is the Globalist’s Next Play?

More executive action by Obama? So far, this strategy has not worked.

More false flags that are not interrupted by the Nationalists?  This has not seemed to work very well so far.

Staged financial meltdown?  Threats from the Federal Reserve and the IMF have not worked too well either. The next meltdown will bring down the whole pyramid.

Threats that the US currency will collapse when Russia and China are allowed as reserve currencies in the IMF?  This happened and it had zero net effect on US currency.

Faking another boom/bust cycle on Wall Street?  This was tried last September and only the billionaires who tried to manipulate the market lost money.

Drive all of the off-shore tax haven money into the U.S.?  This has happened for all but the British off-shore tax havens and now America is the largest off-shore haven in the world. Just corralling the criminal rich into one place for the Globalists to steal from them, too, now that the middle class and precariat class have been decimated.  

Bomb more Muslim countries to create new terrorists dedicated to annihilating America?  Obama is the only president who has remained “at war” throughout his presidency.  He is the number one mass murderer in U.S. history – along with Hilary Clinton his Secretary of State who supported these war-crimes.

Stage an alien visitation where super-human aliens demand we lay down our weapons? According to the Pope, this has happened in the past and Pope Francis is awaiting the alien arrival every day.

Declare Marshall Law? Obama has bundled the Executive Orders concerning all types of attacks against US national security: military, economic, banking, cyber-attacks, currency attacks, and many others so that the president can wage war without telling Americans a thing about it.  This has already happened with the bombing of Syria, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Sudan, Turkey, and Afghanistan.

Give the United Nations (the Globalists) control over America?  This is happening quickly whether we know it or not.  This is more than likely the clearest path Obama and the Globalists have to conquer the United States of America.

We are at war and if you don’t know it, you might be the next victim.  

We keep writing these articles because we are too old to fight on the battlefield with our younger patriots. What we offer is wisdom and a world view that can see a larger picture than those who are just struggling to hold on to pay bills and feed their families.  

In whatever way you can, please take our words and articles and translate them to the community of people you influence.  We need to appeal the Patriot Act, arm ourselves, stand up for our country and protect its borders, language and culture (thank you, Dr. Savage), its Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  

We need the next president to immediately rescind every Executive Action created by Obama in his seven-year reign of terror. We need to pull out of the UN and immediately stop funding their Globalist agenda, which includes all CERN operations. Please read out article on CERN, another huge false flag, below:

CERN is the Biggest Science Scam in History

We must depose the Globalists from their ivory towers of “corporations too big to go bust”, UN warlord banksters and financial manipulators like George Soros, and the banking families of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, Warburgs, and the like.

We must take back our country and make sure that U.S. troops, FEMA, Homeland Security, FBI, CIA, ATF and the other federal agencies that have been infiltrated by the transnational Globalists do not continue to undermine U.S. freedom and democracy.

We must learn to know when the media is feeding us false flags as the truth and when the Department of Defense is conducting propaganda against its own people.  The rubric for analyzing a mass shooting to see if it is a false flag is one of the tools the Anonymous Patriots share with all Americans so that the true intent of the dark brotherhoods might be brought to the clear light of day.

Stay strong and free, fellow patriots and nationalists, and let no one control your connection to abundance, prosperity, ease, joy, and freedom.

And thanks to our friends in New Zealand who remind us how easy it is to herd a mass of sheep with the fear of a few barking dogs.  May we all live without FEAR and run to any pasture we desire!

Who Runs Washington? The Long

Reach of Big-Pharma

24234234333

 

Like a mythical sea monster, the true nature of a Wall Street-London centered global corporatocracy is often talked about but rarely seen.

However, on rare occasions, a tentacle breaks the surface and affords the public an opportunity to examine and assess its true, gargantuan dimensions.

Just such a moment occurred when leaked diplomatic letters from the Colombian Embassy in Washington D.C. revealed just how far the United States government is willing to go on behalf of the corporate-financier interests that clearly shape the entirety of its foreign policy.

The Intercept would report in its article, “Leaks Show Senate Aide Threatened Colombia Over Cheap Cancer Drug,” that:

Leaked diplomatic letters sent from Colombia’s Embassy in Washington describe how a staffer with the Senate Finance Committee, which is led by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, warned of repercussions if Colombia moves forward on approving the cheaper, generic form of a cancer drug.

The drug is called imatinib [Gleevec]. Its manufacturer, Novartis, markets the drug in Colombia as Glivec. The World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines last year suggested it as treatment not only for chronic myeloid leukemia, but also gastrointestinal tumors. Currently, the cost of an annual supply is over $15,000, or about two times the average Colombian’s income.

The repercussions included threats to derail the $450 million “Peace Colombia” initiative aimed at ending decades of fighting in the South American nation that has claimed nearly a quarter of a million lives.

Leveraging peace and stability in Colombia to force Bogotá to capitulate to pharmaceutical giants like Novartis seems extreme, but upon closer examination of other episodes in recent history – including the US invasion and occupation of Iraq, the subversion of Libya and Syria, and admitted US ambitions to encircle and contain China, such coercion is a common feature of the Wall Street-London centric “international order” Washington eagerly promotes.

What is perhaps most appalling about this most recent episode is that Novartis’ “patent” is for a drug developed using public funding over several decades through the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Indeed, in 1990, NIH-funded researcher Dr. Brian Druker began developing model systems integral to bringing “Glivec” to market. He would eventually partner directly with Ciba-Geigy (now Novartis) before clinical trials began.

The NIH’s own report, “Fighting Cancer: Ushering in a New Era of Molecular Medicine (.pdf),” would proudly admit:

The NIH’s National Cancer Institute (NCI), along with many other public and private organizations, played a vital role in developing Gleevec®. 

The nature of pharmaceutical giants building fortunes upon publicly funded research, with Gleevec serving as a primary example, was in even the subject of an entire paper published by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the title, “Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules (.pdf).”

Who Runs Washington? 

If corporate-financier interests would jeopardize the peace and stability of an entire nation to maintain a monopoly over a single pharmaceutical – developed not even by them, but by publicly funded research – what would these same sort of corporate-financier interests do if the stakes were infinitely highersay as high as pushing through a region-wide trade deal that would give such interests monopolies not over a single chemical compound, but over entire industries?

It is clear that elected representatives in Washington, London, and across the rest of the European Union do not represent the interests of those who elected them.

Instead, they are clearly subject to and instruments of corporate-financier special interests – not just from across the pharmaceutical industry, but from a variety of industries ranging from finance and banking to big-oil, big-ag, and big-defense.

Understanding this simple truth – demonstrated unequivocally amid Washington’s latest row with its “ally” Colombia – is the first step in formulating a means to rebalance this inequity.

Dealing With Unwarranted Influence 

The leaks revealing Washington’s handling of Colombia, however, provide a valuable potential means of confronting and confounding this immense, unwarranted influence in the immediate future.

The leaks take pressure off the Colombian government itself and put the narrative into the hands of third parties who can more credibly pass on the information to the public. Other nations facing behind-the-scenes coercion might likewise use the “leaked communique” method to take pressure off of themselves, and shift it onto the immense corporate-financier interests bearing down on them.

For the pharmaceutical industry specifically – which has attempted to guard its monopolies under the pretext of providing humanity with invaluable, irreplaceable products and services essential for humanity’s well-being – since pharmaceuticals and other medical therapies are indeed essential matters of life and death, they should be nationalized and the “intellectual property” held by these corporations – paid for by public funding – should be rendered as opensource. This arrangement would be not entirely unlike how the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) approaches space exploration.

For corporate-financier special interests in general, it is essential for both individual nations and local communities around the world to create alternatives to these monopolies and begin the process of systematically and permanently boycotting and replacing them. Not only will this redistribute wealth pragmatically rather than politically, it will create a more equitable balance of power geopolitically.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook”.

SOURCE:-http://journal-neo.org/2016/06/03/who-runs-washington-the-long-reach-of-big-pharma/

WATCH OUT ABOUT TRANSFERRING MONEY BY MODERN DEVICES USING THE INTERNET!

(17/05/16 INTRODUCTION by Steve, author of this website).

THE FOLLOWING LINK IS A WARNING TO THOSE USING THE LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN THE UK.

IT HAS BECOME EASIER FOR YOU TO BE ROBBED OF YOUR MONEY, WHEN TRANSFERRING IT ON-LINE!

How do I know? Because it just happened to me here in the UK!

If you are based in the UK & are sending monies to someone, by the internet,then you might have to go back to the old fashioned way of really making sure that  th money is properly put straight into the bank itself, or you could be sorrry!

The following LINK explains it really well for those living in the UK:-

http://www.smarterweblife.com/1203/

A New Digital Cash System Was

Just Unveiled At a Secret Meeting

for Bankers in New York

Cashless Society May 8, 2016 
 

blockchain

Via The Economic Collapse

Last month, a “secret meeting” that involved more than 100 executives from some of the biggest financial institutions in the United States was held in New York City.  During this “secret meeting“, a company known as “Chain” unveiled a technology that transforms U.S. dollars into “pure digital assets”.  Reportedly, there were representatives from Nasdaq, Citigroup, Visa, Fidelity, Fiserv and Pfizer in the room, and Chain also claims to be partnering with Capital One, State Street, and First Data.  This “revolutionary” technology is intended to completely change the way that we use money, and it would represent a major step toward a cashless society.  But if this new digital cash system is going to be so good for society, why was it unveiled during a secret meeting for Wall Street bankers?  Is there something more going on here than we are being told?

None of us probably would have ever heard about this secret meeting if it was not for a report in Bloomberg.  The following comes from their article entitled “Inside the Secret Meeting Where Wall Street Tested Digital Cash“…

On a recent Monday in April, more than 100 executives from some of the world’s largest financial institutions gathered for a private meeting at the Times Square office of Nasdaq Inc. They weren’t there to just talk about blockchain, the new technology some predict will transform finance, but to build and experiment with the software.

By the end of the day, they had seen something revolutionary: U.S. dollars transformed into pure digital assets, able to be used to execute and settle a trade instantly. That’s the promise of a blockchain, where the cumbersome and error-prone system that takes days to move money across town or around the world is replaced with almost instant certainty.

So it is not just Michael Snyder from The Economic Collapse Blog that is referring to this gathering as a “secret meeting”.  This is actually how it was described by Bloomberg.  And I think that there is a very good reason why this meeting was held in secret, because many in the general public would definitely be alarmed by this giant step toward a cashless society.  Here is more on this new system from Bloomberg


 

While cash in a bank account moves electronically all the time today, there’s a distinction between that system and what it means to say money is digital. Electronic payments are really just messages that cash needs to move from one account to another, and this reconciliation is what adds time to the payments process. For customers, moving money between accounts can take days as banks wait for confirmations. Digital dollars, however, are pre-loaded into a system like a blockchain. From there, they can be swapped immediately for an asset.

“Instead of a record or message being moved, it’s the actual asset,” Ludwin said. “The payment and the settlement become the same thing.”

Why this is so alarming is because we are seeing other major moves toward a cashless system all over the planet.  In Sweden, 95 percent of all retail transactions are already cashless, and ATM machines are being removed by the hundreds.  In Denmark, government officials actually have a stated goal of “eradicating cash” by the year 2030.  And in Norway, the biggest bank in the country has publicly called for the complete elimination of all cash.

Other nations in Europe have already banned cash transactions over a certain amount. Here are just a couple of examples

As I have written about previously, cash transactions of more than 2,500 euros have already been banned in Spain, and France and Italy have both banned all cash transactions of more than 1,000 euros.

Little by little, cash is being eradicated, and what we have seen so far is just the beginning. 417 billion cashless transactions were conducted in 2014, and the final number for 2015 is projected to be much higher.

The global push toward a cashless society is only going to intensify, because banks and governments both tend to really like the idea of such a system.

Banks really like the concept of a cashless society because it would force everyone to be their customers.  There would be no more hiding cash in a mattress at home or trying to pay all of your bills with paper money.  Under a cashless system, we would all be dependent on the banks, and they would make lots of money whenever we swiped our cards or our “chips” were scanned.

Governments see a lot of advantages in a cashless society as well.  They tell us that they would be able to crack down on drug dealers, tax evaders, terrorists and money launderers, but the truth is that it would enable them to watch, track, monitor and control virtually all of our financial transactions.  Our lives would become open books to the government, and financial privacy would be a thing of the past.

In addition, the potential for tyranny would be absolutely off the charts.

Just imagine a world where the government could serve as the gatekeeper for who is allowed to use the cashless system and who is not.  They could require that we all submit to some sort of government-issued form of identification before being permitted to operate within the system, or it is even conceivable that a loyalty oath would be required.

Of course if you did not submit to their demands, you could not buy, sell, open a bank account or get a job without access to the cashless system.

Hopefully people can understand where this is going.  Paper money is a very important component of our freedom, and if it is taken away from us that will open the door for all sorts of abuse.

Even now, cash is slowly being “criminalized” in America.  For example, if cash is used to pay for a hotel room that is considered by federal authorities to be “suspicious activity” that should be reported to the government.  Of course it isn’t against the law to pay your hotel bill in cash just yet, but according to the government it is something that “terrorists” do so it needs to be closely watched.

It doesn’t take a whole lot of imagination to see where all of this is going.  And for those of us that understand what time it is, this is a clear indication that it is getting late in the game.

Rothschild Bank Now Under

Criminal Investigation after Baron

David De Rothschild Indictment

 
March 7, 2016
 

 

rths

Via Activist Post

Last year, Baron David de Rothschild was indicted by the French government after he was accused of fraud in a scheme that allegedly embezzled large sums of money from British pensioners.

It has taken many years to bring this case against Rothschild and his company the Rothschild Financial Services Group, which trapped hundreds of pensioners in a bogus loan scheme between the years of 2005 and 2008.

One by one the pensioners lost their money and pressed charges against the notorious banker, beginning a case that would take many years to get even an indictment.

In June, Paris-based liaison judge Javier Gómez Bermudez ruled that Rothschild must face a trial for his crimes, and ordered local police to seek him out in his various mansions that are spread throughout the country.

“It is a good step in the right direction. The courts are now in agreement with us that there is enough evidence to interrogate Baron Rothschild. The first thing they will have to do is find him. Once they have done that they can begin to question him. It is a real breakthrough moment for everyone involved,” lawyer Antonio Flores of Lawbird told the Olive Press after the ruling.

“In short, independently of what happened to the investment, Rothschild advertised a loan aimed at reducing inheritance tax, which is a breach of tax law,” he added.

While news of a single Rothschild being indicted is certainly noteworthy, a particularly important announcement was made this Friday.

The French government announced that it has launched an investigation into the entire Swiss branch of the Rothschild’s banking empire.

According to Bloomberg,


 

The Swiss unit of Edmond de Rothschild said it’s the subject of a French probe regarding a former business relationship managed by a former employee.

“Edmond de Rothschild (Suisse) SA is actively participating in the criminal investigation under way,” the Geneva-based bank said in an e-mailed statement on Friday. “The bank denies all the allegations that have been made against it.”

Edmond de Rothschild, a private banking and asset management firm established in Paris in 1953, oversees about 150 billion euros ($164 billion) and is led today by Baron Benjamin de Rothschild and his wife Ariane. The Swiss unit traces its roots to the acquisition of Banque Privee in Geneva in 1965.

The company has no further comment at this time, according to the statement. Officials in Geneva weren’t immediately available to respond to a telephone call from Bloomberg News on Friday.

The Rothschild empire has been instrumental in helping move the global elite’s wealth from traditional tax havens like the Bahamas, Switzerland and the British Virgin Islands to the U.S.

Last month, the Free Thought Project reported on the above the law tax haven established inside the United States by the Rothschilds.

After opening a trust company in Reno, Nev., Rothschild & Co. began ushering the massive fortunes of the world’s most wealthy individuals out of typical tax havens, and into the Rothschild run U.S. trusts, which are exempt from the international reporting requirements.

The Rothschild banking dynasty is a family line that has been accused of pulling the political strings of many different governments through their control of various economic systems throughout the world.

Historically, there is ample evidence to show that the family has used insider trading to bilk money from both private and public funds.

During the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic wars, Nathan Rothschild was responsible for one of the oldest cases of “insider trading,” which led to the Rothschild family robbing a whole nation blind. In 1815 when the battle of Waterloo took place, there were no quick methods of communication like we have today so messengers were used for communication in times of war. The Rothschild’s took advantage of this by having spies on the frontlines of the battle who would return information to the family faster than the messengers used by the military.

When the British won the war, Nathan Rothschild, was of course, the first to know, and he immediately went to the stock exchange and started selling stocks while putting out the rumor that the French had won the war. This created a panic on the floor of the stock exchange and investors all over England began frantically selling their stocks. With the price of all stocks plummeting Rothschild was able to buy out the whole English market for a fraction of its cost. When word returned that the English had actually been victorious, the value of the market soared, and overnight Nathan Rothschild expanded his family’s wealth, and cemented their position as one of the richest families in the world