“Transition”??? POST BREXIT

I watched the BBC/ITN coverage of the “transition” from Cameron to May. You would have THOUGHT that it was “a national public holiday”, right up there with the Queen’s “birthday” celebrations! But it WASN’T, and there is NOTHING to be “celebrating” I’m afraid.

I watched Cameron’s departure speech outside No. 10, bragging about all his accomplishments, YET AGAIN bombarding us with “statistics” that DON’T translate into REAL LIFE for the MILLIONS he has screwed over these last six years (for reasons I don’t have time to go into here, but for which the majority voted AGAINST the EU and subsequently the current Government – you can look it all up on-line for your self)! He carefully left out the more important details that actually tell the REAL story, such as THE “NATIONAL DEBT” has gone UP, ALL ALONG!!! He also left out ALL the policies he was challenged on (and DEFEATED) in Parliament by the opposition (by Jeremy Corbyn). It was basically, “same old same old” BS from one of “the usual suspects”. TRUTH IS – he is GONE (on to make his millions “in private life” no doubt, as Bliar did!), as now is also his compatriot in crime, George Osbourne! “Hooray!” But don’t think ANYTHING has changed! NOTHING has changed, only “the faces have changed, to protect the guilty!”, as will be born out in due time! Wait and see!

As for May’s “coronation” speech…? How DARE she? How DARE she insult the public intelligence by saying she understood their plight, addressing them “directly”, when you look at ALL the policies she stood for and voted for (and those she voted against) while she was “Home Secretary” for six years – basically AGAINST everything that was of PERSONAL interest to those she was “addressing directly”!!! Can you BELIEVE her? “Can a leopord change it’s spots?”

If you look at her “new cabinet” you should be able to clearly see “convenient” side-steps and deceptive mis-leadings! If you want to KNOW what the UK is in for next you only have to look at their PAST RECORDS! The MAJORITY are “remainers”, the former Foreign Secretary is now The Chancellor of the Exchequer (Finance Minister = big business, following up on all the contacts made in his previous position), the “Health Secretary” remains the same, (odiously – dismantling the NHS), and a man who those abroad openly laugh at and can’t take seriously is now the new Foreign Secretary!

Is “something wrong with this picture”? We’ll see, but I expect a delay in triggering “Article 50” for leaving the EU, a delay in calling for ANY “General Election”, and a continued attempt at trying to hold on to and consolidate their “power”, for as long as possible, in order to wreak as much damage as possible, before an expected landslide victory in the next general election (led by a man who is “un-electable” and “not a leader” – the ONLY political person on the scene who actually HAS a following, in sheer numbers outstripping ANYONE who has been elected to parliament in four to five decades!!!)

Oh, and “The Chilcott Report” is now, conveniently, off the national headlines!!!

(Sheesh! “Who writes this stuff?”)

Donald Sutherland said, after completing the “Hunger Games” films, that he hoped that the story would stir up the youth, to move to change things. In the end, Katniss realised that they had just overthrown one system for another, with just the same kind of a ruler (so she executed THAT one!).

In the “Divergent” series Tris is discovering that there are “systems” over systems (as David Icke once explained it, like the layers of an onion), and only those considered “genetically pure” are allowed access to those upper layers (sound familiar???). I wait to see how that turns out (if there is time to).

In “The Matrix” series it was made clear that the ONLY way out was to COMPLETELY DISCONNECT!!!

And in “V – for Vendetta” when Evey, representative of the next generation, was presented with a choice, to preserve the status quo or destroy it, she pulled the lever that led to its destruction!

You CANNOT build a NEW building on an OLD foundation! It will ONLY end up being a “patchwork” at best, a patchwork that will eventually ALWAYS FAIL in ts weakest areas. At its WORST? – Not just “more of the same”, but a WORSE “more of the same”!!!

Time for a (real) “new broom” with “a clean sweep”! NOTHING ELSE will do, or work!


Posted by justnews4m1

Brexit Aftermath - Here’s What Will Happen Next

In my article 'Brexit: Global Trigger Event, Fake Out Or Something Else?', published before the U.K. referendum vote, I outlined numerous reasons why I believed the Brexit was likely to pass. As far as I know, I was one of very few analysts that stuck to my call of a successful Brexit right up until the day of the referendum instead of slowly backing away as the pressure of conflicting polls increased. My prediction was verified that evening.

In my post-Brexit commentary, which can be read here, I then outlined why so many analysts in the mainstream and even in the liberty movement were caught completely unaware by the referendum results. Today, however, I now see hundreds of analysts using the same talking points I argued before the Brexit, but still missing the first and most VITAL underlying truth.  The core reason why I was able to discern the Brexit outcome was because I accepted the reality that the Brexit does not hurt globalists — in the long run, it actually helps them.

Now, I fully understand the excitement surrounding this event.  For many people it was a complete surprise because they assumed that international financiers and the ever-pervasive global elites would do anything to stop it from happening. It feels like a kind of revolution; a pointy stick in the eye of the beast. While I applaud the people of the U.K. for their ongoing battle for sovereignty, I can assure you that the Brexit is NOT an obstacle to the plans of globalists.

What is rather amazing to me is the number of people that, before the referendum vote, were arguing that the elites would "never allow" the Brexit to continue and were thoroughly convinced they would use their influence to disrupt it.  Now, in the face of a successful vote, those same people now argue that the elites had no influence over the Brexit, and do not benefit from its passage.

I would remind readers that it was actually "pro-EU" globalist puppet David Cameron himself that presented the prospect of a referendum to exit the EU.  While some may argue this was bungling on the part of Cameron, I think this is a rather foolish notion.  Cameron does what he is told like every other elitist owned politician.  Furthermore, the behavior of internationalists leading up to the Brexit was rather strange, hinting to me that they were preparing for a Brexit surprise.

Globalist financiers like George Soros jumped into the markets and bet in favor of stocks going negative, indicating prior knowledge.  Hilariously, Soros' advisers are now playing damage control by claiming that Soros "lost money" on bets on the English Pound.  While they admit he did "make profits" on all of his other investments due to the Brexit, they will not say what the magnitude of those investments were, nor have they provided evidence supporting any of the information they have given to the media on his losses on the Pound.  Truly, a slapdash lazy play at spin control.

The Federal Reserve’s Janet Yellen used the Brexit as the primary reason for the latest rate hike delay, mentioning that such conditions may have influence "for some time to come".  This indicates she may have had prior knowledge of its coming passage.

And the world’s central bankers all convened in Basel, Switzerland to take marching orders from their masters at the Bank for Internationals Settlements right before Brexit voting commenced, something they most likely would not do if the Brexit was destined to fail rather than prevail.

Not only did the globalists through David Cameron originally introduce the concept of the Brexit vote, they also apparently knew that the U.K. referendum would succeed.

As I originally stated in my prediction article:

“…the failure of the EU does not necessarily mean a failure for the internationalists. For groups of globalists that promote an ideology of Fabian Socialism, a breakdown of the EU, whether partial or total, can be used as leverage for a larger and more centralized global power structure in the long term. Mark my words, when the system comes crashing down (whether after the Brexit or after another trigger event), internationalists will say that the EU failed not because it was centralized, but because it was not centralized ENOUGH.”

“If the Brexit succeeds, the globalists can allow the market systems they have been inflating for years to finally crash (at the speed they choose). They can then blame those dastardly “far-Right extremists” in the U.K. for triggering a domino effect within the global financial system, conveniently scapegoating British conservatives, moderates and sovereigns for a breakdown that was going to happen eventually anyway. Their solution will once again be to argue for the end of “barbaric” conservative principles and install complete centralization and socialism as the cure.”

Already, this narrative is being presented by internationalists in the aftermath of the referendum.

Bloomberg writes that the Brexit “casts a dark shadow on the world’s great move to openness,” as if globalism is a bastion principle of free markets rather than the murderer of free markets and the outright tyrannical socialization and centralization of everything.  European elites are out in droves admonishing the Brexit as a move towards dangerous nationalism and isolationism. The Chinese premier is in the media warning of a “butterfly effect” in global markets caused by instability in “certain countries,” obviously referring to the U.K. and the EU.  His solution?  He wants even more “enhanced coordination” among all the economies of the world (Interpretation: more centralization).

EU officials only continue to strengthen my predictions by calling for an EU superstate in response to the Brexit; in other words, a completely centralized Europe.

And, Bloomberg has reported on Mario Draghi's recent call for a "new world order" in response to the UK referendum in which central bank policies around the globe are completely coordinated.  Bloomberg removed the word "NEW" from the article's title an hour after it was published.  Go figure; I guess mentioning the "new world order" was just a little too honest.

Of course, Draghi does not mention that all central banks are ALREADY coordinated through the Bank for International Settlements, which is why numerous central bank heads were at the BIS when the Brexit vote was underway.  What Draghi is pushing for is open centralization among the world's central banks - the next step towards a single global central bank and a single global currency system.

For more information on why the elites desire an economic crisis and what they hope to gain from it, read my article 'The Economic End Game Explained'.

In my prediction article I also stated in part reference to the Jo Cox murder:

“…the goal may only be to perpetuate a longer term narrative that conservatives in general are a destructive element of society. We kill, we’re racists, we have an archaic mindset that prevents “progress,” we divide supranational unions, we even destroy global economies. We’re storybook monsters.”

“The murder of Jo Cox has had a minimal effect on Brexit polling numbers.  In the end, the elites may find Thomas Mair more useful as a mascot for the Brexit after the vote, rather than before the vote.

So now the Brexit movement, which is conservative in spirit, is labeled a “divisive” and “hateful group”, and if the referendum is triumphant, they will also be called economic saboteurs.”

The concept of a dangerously volatile and destructive populist movement for sovereignty is being heavily pushed in the mainstream media. The racist angle is now being implemented, with the MSM warning that racism is on the rise in the U.K. due to the Brexit campaign.

Most if not all of the developments I warned of when I predicted the Brexit are also coming true.  So, if I am as correct about the motives behind the Brexit as I was correct about the outcome of the Brexit, here is what will probably happen in the coming months as the drama unfolds.

Federal Reserve Catch-22

All eyes will soon be on the Fed to see if the central bank behind the world reserve currency will take some kind of action to mitigate the possible negative effects of the Brexit.  The problem is, the Fed has created a catch-22 scenario here; not for them, they are happy to instigate an equities crisis as long as the timing is right.  Rather, they have created a catch-22 for the markets.

If the Fed raises rates to prove they can, stock markets will see this as a shock move and initiate a sell-off.  If the Fed lowers rates or institutes negative rates, the public will see this as an act of desperation and a loss of credibility.  Really, the only safe measure the Fed can take from now on is to do nothing.  I highly doubt that they will do nothing.  In fact, even in the face of the Brexit I still believe the Fed will raise rates a second time before the end of the year.  Why?  This is what the Fed has always done as recession takes hold.  Historically, the Fed raises rates at the worst possible times.  As with the Brexit, I am going to have to take the contrary position to most analysts on this.

Referendum Catch-22

The globalists have conjured an interesting paradox with the UK referendum.  Look at it this way; even if you believe that the globalists were "caught off guard" by the Brexit, one must admit that it is still in their best interest to initiate a crash.

First, the elites spent so much time warning of the doom that would befall the world if a Brexit vote succeeded, they must now fulfill their own prophecy or appear foolish and impotent.

Second, if globalists and the central banks they control act too aggressively to stall a market plunge, they are sending a message to all other EU nations that they should not worry about seeking their own referendums, because the central banks will save the day if they do.  More referendums mean exponential crisis in equities.  So, markets will crash if the central banks don't act, and they will crash if central banks do act.

This is all an academic discussion, though, because central bankers fully intend for the existing system to at least partially crash.  They simply want to decide the pace of the implosion.  Most will do this through jawboning and minor policy maneuvers, but not much else.  The Federal Reserve is the only wild card in this equation.

Slow Grind Towards The U.S. Elections

While the Brexit vote is a considerable shock to global markets, and there is a likelihood of referendums in other European nations, I do not believe the Brexit alone is enough to cause the kind of economic crisis the elites are seeking.  There needs to be a one-two punch combo here, and the second punch has not arrived yet.

What form will it take?  I have no idea.  I do believe that with the Brexit drama in full swing, the timing is perfect for certain unstable EU banks, including Deutsche Bank, to announce insolvency.  This could be the next moment of shock.  That said, there are hundreds of possible trigger events ready and waiting to be exploited.

So far it would appear that equities markets in particular are in for a slow grind down (with sporadic but short lived rallies) going into the U.S. elections.  I would not expect much to happen until the Fourth of July holiday has passed and I would expect low trading volume to persist until then.  I believe that by the time November arrives the global economy will be in a clear and visible recessionary mode.  This does not mean a "collapse" in the Hollywood sense will be in full swing, but our fiscal structure will be visibly worse off to even the most oblivious citizens.

A Trump Presidency

In light of the Brexit I’m going to have to call it here and now and predict that the most likely scenario for elections will be a Trump presidency.  Trump has consistently warned of a recession during his campaign and with the Brexit dragging markets lower over the next few months, he will probably be proven “prophetic.”

Those who read my articles regularly know that I do not trust Trump and that I think his behavior signals that he is controlled opposition, but this is really beside the point.  Even if Trump is a legitimate anti-establishment conservative, his entry into the Oval Office will seal the deal on the economic collapse, and will serve the globalists well.  The international banks need only pull the plug on any remaining life support to the existing market system and allow it to fully implode, all while blaming Trump and his conservative supporters.

If Hillary Clinton, a clear establishment puppet, is the chosen one, and markets crash after her inauguration, then the establishment gets the blame.  However, if Trump becomes president, and markets crash, then conservative and freedom movements get the blame.

The mainstream media has been consistently comparing Trump supporters to Brexit supporters, and Trump himself has hitched his political wagon to the Brexit. This fits perfectly with the globalist narrative that populists and conservatives are killing the global economy and placing everyone at risk.

Sovereignty Is The Villain

Imagine that the economic and political events of our world are for the most part a cleverly staged piece of cinema. The globalists are writing a screenplay for that cinema and we are all supposed to believe that the movie we are watching is real life rather than an engineered fantasy. The Brexit in our story is an act of “evil sovereignty activists” and “right wing extremists” who lure ignorant people away from the light of globalism using “emotion” rather than logic.

These conservatives and populists promote barbaric principles of nationalism that no longer serve humanity in our age of “reason” and multicultural “civility.”  Globalism is the future and pro-sovereigns are holding the world back from “progress.”

This will be the narrative pressed in politics and social discussions from now on.  The story the globalists are writing is one of the terrorism of selfish freedom movements, how they brought the planet to the verge of complete collapse, and how globalism and collectivism finally “triumphed” and saved humanity.

Divisions Between Young And Old

An interesting and very manipulative propaganda campaign being put in motion around the Brexit is the idea that the U.K. referendum represents a division between older generations and younger generations.  The mainstream media argues that older generations in the U.K. that have already benefited from the EU are now “taking it away” from the younger generations and essentially screwing them out of their futures.

Anyone who understands the root failings of the EU and the fact that it has been on the edge of collapse for the past several years knows that such arguments are patently ridiculous. The EU has been beneficial to no one except in minor part to perpetually insolvent nations and peoples.  The EU aids these folks by stealing from solvent nations and peoples.  The Scottish were extremely anti-Brexit, for example, exactly because they have become a welfare dependent society and they know where their bread is buttered.  Most Muslim refugees aren’t flooding into the EU on the premise that they plan to start from scratch and work their way towards prosperity.  They march into the EU on the promise of free goodies.

Yes, according to recent polls around 73% of voters 18 to 24 years old supported the EU, but around 27% did not.  Does this 27% not count?  People aged 25 to 34 voted 38% in favor of Leave.  Anyone over age 35 was increasingly more likely to vote Leave.  Are people in their late 30's now considered "old"?  This is hardly an example of the "old" destroying the precious collectivist futures of the young.

To claim that the Brexit was about young versus old is clearly a lie, but we should expect that this narrative will be pushed further.  The globalists need to own the minds of the next generation, and they hope to do so by blaming all their future economic woes on the kinds of sovereignty movements that voted for the Brexit.  The young are often desperate to believe that they are wiser than the old, desperate to assert their place in a world they don't yet understand because they have little experience in it, and desperate to prove that new ideas (usually old failed ideas rehashed) are better than traditional ideas.  The elites know this, and are quick to con the young with the concepts of futurism.

The Long Game

The great weakness among economic analysts and many independent analysts is their refusal to examine the long game of the elites.  They become so obsessed with the day to day parade of stock tickers and the month to month central bank policy meetings that they miss the greater trends.  We can focus intently on each drop of water that makes up a tidal wave and forget that we are at the edge of the beach staring down death.

The Brexit is part of a globalist long game that is designed to finally and completely demonize sovereignty movements.

Think about it for a moment — what better way to remove the only obstacle in their path? The globalists create an economic crisis and then foster conditions by which their primary opponents (liberty activists) get BLAMED for it.  They then swoop in as the heroes of their little cinema after the damage is already done and offer their solution: complete globalization.  With enough people destitute from a global financial calamity, they may very well be begging the elites for help.  This is not to say that the elites will ultimately succeed (I believe they will fail), but that does not stop them from making the attempt.

I realize this is not what many in the liberty movement want to hear, but this is reality.  This does not diminish the value of a British movement for sovereignty, but it does demand that we temper our celebration and recognize when we are being targeted with fourth-generation warfare.  If we accept the fact that the Brexit is an event the elites plan to exploit for their own ends, then we can identify the threat and deal with it.  If we continue the delusion that the Brexit is some kind of slap in their face when it is not, then we allow them yet another weapon in their arsenal of propaganda.




If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here.  We greatly appreciate your patronage.


You can contact Brandon Smith at:



Putin Sends Warning To Trump And All America: 'US Elections Being Stolen' - This Video Can Stop WW3

June 22, 2016 

Putin Warns International Observers Being Sent Away From US Polling Stations As Globalists Prepare To Steal The Final Election From America

By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die

In the outstanding video above, which is now seeing some attention across the alternative media but will probably never be touched upon by most of the mainstream media, Russian President Vladimir Putin completely unloads upon Fareed Zakaria of CNN fame while telling him, among many other things, that AT LEAST two US elections have already been stolen, a warning to Donald Trump of what may be coming with the entire 'new world order' now on the line. Putin immediately calls out Zhakaria for the way he categorized previous Putin comments, showing us once again, that those working within the mainstream media are well trained at twisting the words coming from the mouths of others for the benefit of the nwo. 

While the recent story over at SHTFPlan tells us that the US is sleepwalking towards a nuclear confrontation "in our astounding stupidity", we hear directly from the leader of the nation that the US is regularly antagonizing...and who could completely destroy America within an hour by delivering an EMP attack upon us that there is no way that we could stop, sending America back to a time without electricitiy, internet, running water, utilities, a banking system, and devoid of much of government except for the 'continuity of government' which would by then be living in their snug little bunkers underground in Denver

In this eye-opening video, Putin completely destroys the thuggish policies that the Obama administration has had towards Russia (not to mention towards the American people) and we learn why Donald Trump could be 'the light at the end of the tunnel' in wanting to have healthy and good relationships with Russia. Why WOULDN'T the Obama administration want 'healthy relationships' with Russia? As anybody who listens to this video can hear, Putin is NOT looking for war with the US but respectful relationships. Why would we be preparing for war against them that would lead to our total destruction? 

Putin drops several bombshells on us all in this video, sending a loud and clear warning that AT LEAST 2 US elections have already 'been stolen' bringing up the absolutely abominable 'super delegate' process that is not only a kick in the teeth to every American voter across the country but shows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that our voting system is rigged against the will of the American people. 

While Hillary Clinton is still running for president rather than in prison, she and the rigged system have kicked every Bernie Sanders voter in America in the face, basically telling them that they don't count nor do their votes. Think about that Bernie Sanders voters reading this...the proven war criminal, who not only has American BLOOD ON HER HANDS but who is accepting BLOOD MONEY from dictatorial regimes that slaughter gays, is basically stabbing in the back every member of the LGBT community, Black Lives Matters, and everybody else on the left who voted for Bernie Sanders by PROVING to them that their votes don't count. Hitlery could care less about you or any of us. I personally would vote for Bernie in a second flat over lying, crooked Hillary though I long ago learned our votes don't count in this rigged system. 

It's clear that Mr. Putin knows that US elections are rigged as well and as we hear in this video, he sends what could be looked at as a very, very clear warning to Donald Trump in this video: "Crooked Hillary WILL steal this election from you, too....so watch your back!" As anyone who has been following the Clinton's outside of the mainstream media already knows, the list of the dead that follows them everywhere they go is legendary and the absolute corruption surrounding them proves this family is the last family on Earth that Americans want or need back in the White House. If most of America really thinks that lying, crooked, war-criminal, blood-money Hitlery is the 'change we need', maybe they haven't looked at her disastrous record already in the Middle East and Benghazi. If Clinton is the 'change we need', maybe America deserves the 'date with destruction' the globalists have been pushing us towards. 

As we have warned over and over and over again on ANP, Hitlery is clearly the globalists candidate as she's promised to open US borders within 100 days of being elected, thus providing us with the final, fitting 'end of America'. We have also warned that if the globalists feel that they are about to 'lose America', they will pull off the biggest false flag attack ever....putting an end to the elections and possibly keeping Obama in office.

If they can't steal the election via the Diebold machines they control, the globalists will steal it by either taking down Trump or pulling off some kind of a BREXIT-style false flag such as the recent horrific shooting in the UK that may have been carried out by a mind-controlled MK-ultra slave and one that very well may keep the UK in the European Union if recent polls are correct showing a monumental shift since the killing of Jo Cox.

Listen to Mr. Putin... he tells us that Russia stays out of the US's business, though he drops another bombshell on us in telling us that those from the international community who would like to monitor US elections have been forced away by US prosecutors, so we should stay out of Russia's business, too. However, like the ever-present and brutish 'big brother' that US government has become, it continues to poke the Russian bear...over and over and over again....almost as if US leaders and this administration WANT Putin to respond and completely annihilate us so we can completely annihilate them.

Putin clearly doesn't want to send the US back to the dark ages...he wants to build strong relationships with us...how this administration responds over the next few months will tell us if the US gets into 2017 alive and well or in a total and utter chaos. Putin also shows us why Americans need to get rid of this administration that has totally sucked up to the  'new world order' before they completely destroy us via NATO's belligerence towards a country that clearly has no ill will against the American people. 

While we certainly understand that Putin was the prior head of the KGB and no angel, the leadership that he has displayed in Russia through this ongoing crisis should be commended, especially in comparison to what we've gotten from the administration here.

This video could also be looked at as a final warning to America...try to get it right this time because lowly scum are preparing to steal another election from you and send you into another downward spiral that will lead to your Republics utter destruction, thus, completing the process of what the globalists running American into the ground today want anyways. 


The American people had better turn off the Trump and Hillary show


Are the U.S. and NATO inciting

Russia into war?

 June 7, 2016     By  Chuck Baldwin


To thousands of objective "experts," it does appear so.

BALTOPS 16, a NATO military exercise is now taking place in the Baltic Sea in very close proximity to Russia. "Over the next three weeks BALTOPS 16 will draw together some 6,000 personnel, 45 warships, and 60 aircraft from 17 nations, including the United States, Germany, the U.K., the Netherlands, along with the littoral states of the Baltic States who are NATO members (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Denmark) or NATO partners (Sweden and Finland)"

"Washington’s move to place a new ground-based missile defense system in Romania with Poland’s recruitment drive and the BALTOPS 16 exercise will surely raise tensions with Russia which are at an all time high since the Cold War. Russia views this move as a threat to its security with NATO’s encirclement of Russia is as reckless and as dangerous as you can get in terms of escalating the possibility of a disastrous war."

(Imagine how the American people would react if Russia were putting missile systems on our northern and southern borders.)

"Russia is more than prepared to fight a war against NATO which would not last more than three days at best according to the Rand Corporation, a think tank based in Santa Monica, California. The Rand corporation employed well-known players in the political arena including war criminal Henry Kissinger as an advisor and George W. Bush-era Neocons such as Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (former Chairman of the board 1981-1986 and again in 1995-1996) and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice who was a former intern and trustee.

The RAND corporation report admitted that a NATO war against Russia would last between 36 and 60 hours."

"If NATO were that foolish to start a war against Russia, European countries across Western Europe would be open to Russian missile strikes crippling Europe’s already fragile social and economic fabric. An attack on Russia would be the end of NATO, literally. Russia has capabilities that are far more advanced than what the U.S. and NATO forces have in their arsenal."

Comments: 10/06/16 by S.N Strutt, author of this website:-

If the NEO-CONS (Hawkish right-wing of the USA government), all know that the USA, in reality, cannot win a war against Russia, then why are they insanely pushing for a war between NATO & Russia, knowing that USA cannot win?

It would be complete suicide! Like the old movie "WAR GAMES" from the eighties.


To understand this, one needs to study about EUGENICS.

Here is the LINK on my website:-


and how the ILLUMINATI WANT to get rid of 95% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION, while they supposedly escape to their understand bunkers and cities.

Yes, you heard that right!

I know it is very hard to understand that there are unscrupulous people who run nations like the USA, and they themselves are mere puppets of the "MASTERS of THE BIG GAME": i.e TO FORCE A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT on all of the SURVIVERS of THEIR MANIPULATED DISASTERS, INCLUDING AN ENGINEERED POSSIBLE NUCLEAR WAR.


I think the big downfall of the NEO-CONS, and their masters, the ILUMMINATI is indeed their ARROGANCE.



Here is some spiritual insight into the matter concerning the NEW WORLD ORDER insisting on bringing on a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT:-

     "THERE'S AN AMAZING DESCRIPTION OF SATAN IN THE 28TH CHAPTER OF EZEKIEL WHERE HE'S CALLED THE PRINCE OF TYRUS. Now why would the Lord call the Devil the Prince of Tyre unless the Devil himself loved Tyre & ruled over Tyre as its King? It must have been that the King of Tyre was actually Satan-possessed by the Devil himself! It was a very wicked city & a great commercial empire run by the Phoenicians, & spread its iniquity all over the whole World.

     SATAN WAS ALSO KING OF BABYLON IN THE DAYS OF HER GLORY. In Ezekiel he's called the King of Tyre, & in Isaiah 14 he's called the King of Babylon. Well, if the Devil was at one time King of Tyre, & then another time King of Babylon, the capital of the great World Empire of Babylonia, then it stands to reason logically that he must have been the King of each of these great World Empires, or possessed their kings & ruled them & lived in splendour & grandeur in their great lavish capital cities!

     IN EVERY ONE OF THESE WORLD EMPIRES, APPARENTLY ONE OR MORE OF ITS KINGS WERE POSSESSED BY SATAN HIMSELF in his effort to rule the World. But every time God destroyed his Empire & its capital city & its kings. Then he'd go right on to another Empire & build a new one! So apparently the Devil has been possessing the greatest kings of the Earth down through the ages, some more than others.

     Qu:DO YOU THINK MAYBE HE FLITS AROUND TO GREAT ANTI-CHRIST MEN LIKE HITLER & NAPOLEON? I wouldn't be surprised that he's possessed some of the World's great conquerors & great World leaders. Of course, why not?--He wants to rule the World, why shouldn't he?--And not one of them was ever a great Christian. There were no truly great World leaders who were Christians.

     THOSE WHO WANT TO RULE THIS WORLD ARE NOT CHRISTIANS; THEY'RE USUALLY ANTI-CHRIST & they do it cruelly with slaughter & armies & murder & by any means possible.

     AND CERTAINLY THE BIBLE DEFINITELY TEACHES THAT THE ANTICHRIST WILL BE THE DEVIL IN PERSON, the Devil in the flesh, to rule the World's last great World Government or Kingdom. So apparently the Devil has been the King of all these great World Empires & their capitals, possessing their kings & running their governments, & every one of them always persecuted God's people!


So obviously these World Empires were ruled by the Devil, who persecuted God's Kingdom & God's people right to the very End, from Pharaoh to the Antichrist!

     I'VE NEVER HEARD THAT THEORY ADVANCED BEFORE; MAYBE IT WAS A REVELATION! I got it when I was reading Ezekiel 28, & then I turned to Isaiah 14 & read that. I thought, "Well, that's strange, the Devil in one place is described as the King of Tyre, & here in another he's described as the King of Babylon.--How could he be both?" So that's a new theory, a revelation!

     THERE IT IS, AS PLAIN AS DAY, RIGHT IN THE BIBLE! It specifically mentions the King of Tyre & the King of Babylon in descriptions which could only fit the Devil himself! So the Devil went from one Kingdom to the other to possess its king & its capital & its empire in an attempt to continue to rule the World. Every time God would destroy one, he'd go to the next one & start over, or continue.

     "SATAN--KING OF EMPIRES" CERTAINLY IS, I THINK, A PROVEN THEORY. It's very logical & consistent, that he has been the King of every World Empire. He's been the ruler of all the World's capitals, & his Kingdom is always opposed to the Kingdom of Christ.

    Jesus is my King of kings!--Who's yours?"

(Excerpt from "Satan King of Empires!" By D.B.Berg,  1980)



See also the "END OF AMERICA THE WHORE" on this website:

LINK (-http://www.outofthebottomlesspit.co.uk/418803990)

End of comments by Steve.



"The U.S. and its allies including Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia and other Gulf puppet states were all involved in creating the civil war in Syria in 2011 through a proxy opposition group to oust President Bashar al-Assad.


The“protests” were orchestrated by a covert operation led by US-NATO-Israeli intelligence agencies to create chaos in order to fault the Syrian government through propaganda. Washington and Israel want to destabilize Syria as a Nation State and break-up Syria into several small nation-states easier for the governments of the U.S. and Israel to control. Israel’s interest in destabilizing Syria goes back decades, perhaps as far back when the State of Israel was declared a new independent state in 1948."

"For Now, Washington (a bully in its own right) will continue to target smaller, weaker nations with their terrorists who they fund, train and manage in the Middle East and Africa. They will continue to destabilize governments through “regime change” in Latin America as they recently did in Brazil and are in the process of targeting Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia through their Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) or controlled “opposition groups” allied with Washington and Wall Street. The American Empire will continue to rape and pillage the planet’s resources; after all, the American Empire follows the typical patterns of past empires who committed similar crimes against humanity."

"As for NATO forces on Russia’s borders, they would be destroyed in less than three days if they were foolish enough to follow Washington’s orders, then again Vassal states have no say in their own foreign or domestic affairs in the first place. NATO is a willing participant waiting for its annihilation as they sacrifice their lives and their nations in a war against Russia not for Europe, but for the American Empire."

See the report:


Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Ronald Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, was absolutely right when he said that, "The crazed filth that controls US foreign policy is capable of defending US hegemony with nuclear weapons. The neoconservatives must be removed from power, arrested, and put on international trial for their horrendous war crimes before they defend their hegemony with Armageddon.

"Neoconservatives and their allies in the military/security complex make audacious use of false flag attacks. These evil people are capable of orchestrating a false flag attack that propels the US and Russia to war."

See the report:


At some point, the only way the Neocons in Washington, D.C., and their crony capitalists in New York City can keep their charade afloat is via a major war. War is the ultimate vehicle of globalists to enslave free societies. Is that what D.C. has planned for our near future? Think of the the "national emergency" orders that could be executed by the President; think of the abridgments of the Bill of Rights; think of the entire American nation under "Lock down." Not to mention the loss of multiplied thousands of innocent American lives.

And for those of us who still believe in the importance of "Just War," please remember that the greatest international crime in the eyes of God is the act of aggressive war--nothing equals its condemnation by a Holy God. And right now it seems crystal clear: the U.S. and NATO are the aggressors and, therefore, if forced into war, it would be Russia who would be fighting a defensive, and thus, "Just War."

In the past, Germany, Japan, and Italy found themselves on the wrong side of history. Right now, it seems obvious that it is the United States and NATO--along with Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Israel--that are on the wrong side of history.

The American people had better turn off the Trump and Hillary show long enough to pay attention to what is happening right now in Eastern Europe. It will be too late when nuclear missiles start landing in your back yard, folks.



A Russian Warning

May 31, 2016

We, the undersigned, are Russians living and working in the USA. We have been watching with increasing anxiety as the current US and NATO policies have set us on an extremely dangerous collision course with the Russian Federation, as well as with China. Many respected, patriotic Americans, such as Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Cohen, Philip Giraldi, Ray McGovern and many others have been issuing warnings of a looming a Third World War. But their voices have been all but lost among the din of a mass media that is full of deceptive and inaccurate stories that characterize the Russian economy as being in shambles and the Russian military as weak—all based on no evidence. But we—knowing both Russian history and the current state of Russian society and the Russian military, cannot swallow these lies. We now feel that it is our duty, as Russians living in the US, to warn the American people that they are being lied to, and to tell them the truth. And the truth is simply this:

If there is going to be a war with Russia, then the United States will most certainly be destroyed, and most of us will end up dead.

Let us take a step back and put what is happening in a historical context. Russia has suffered a great deal at the hands of foreign invaders, losing 22 million people in World War II. Most of the dead were civilians, because the country was invaded, and the Russians have vowed to never let such a disaster happen again. Each time Russia had been invaded, she emerged victorious. In 1812 Nepoleon invaded Russia; in 1814 Russian cavalry rode into Paris. On June 22, 1941, Hitler’s Luftwaffe bombed Kiev; On May 8, 1945, Soviet troops rolled into Berlin.

But times have changed since then. If Hitler were to attack Russia today, he would be dead 20 to 30 minutes later, his bunker reduced to glowing rubble by a strike from a Kalibr supersonic cruise missile launched from a small Russian navy ship somewhere in the Baltic Sea. The operational abilities of the new Russian military have been most persuasively demonstrated during the recent action against ISIS, Al Nusra and other foreign-funded terrorist groups operating in Syria. A long time ago Russia had to respond to provocations by fighting land battles on her own territory, then launching a counter-invasion; but this is no longer necessary. Russia’s new weapons make retaliation instant, undetectable, unstoppable and perfectly lethal.

Thus, if tomorrow a war were to break out between the US and Russia, it is guaranteed that the US would be obliterated. At a minimum, there would no longer be an electric grid, no internet, no oil and gas pipelines, no interstate highway system, no air transportation or GPS-based navigation. Financial centers would lie in ruins. Government at every level would cease to function. US armed forces, stationed all around the globe, would no longer be resupplied. At a maximum, the entire landmass of the US would be covered by a layer of radioactive ash. We tell you this not to be alarmist, but because, based on everything we know, we are ourselves alarmed. If attacked, Russia will not back down; she will retaliate, and she will utterly annihilate the United States.

The US leadership has done everything it could to push the situation to the brink of disaster. First, its anti-Russian policies have convinced the Russian leadership that making concessions or negotiating with the West is futile. It has become apparent that the West will always support any individual, movement or government that is anti-Russian, be it tax-cheating Russian oligarchs, convicted Ukrainian war criminals, Saudi-supported Wahhabi terrorists in Chechnya or cathedral-desecrating punks in Moscow. Now that NATO, in violation of its previous promises, has expanded right up to the Russian border, with US forces deployed in the Baltic states, within artillery range of St. Petersburg, Russia’s second-largest city, the Russians have nowhere left to retreat. They will not attack; nor will they back down or surrender. The Russian leadership enjoys over 80% of popular support; the remaining 20% seems to feel that it is being too soft in opposing Western encroachment. But Russia will retaliate, and a provocation or a simple mistake could trigger a sequence of events that will end with millions of Americans dead and the US in ruins.

Unlike many Americans, who see war as an exciting, victorious foreign adventure, the Russians hate and fear war. But they are also ready for it, and they have been preparing for war for several years now. Their preparations have been most effective. Unlike the US, which squanders untold billions on dubious overpriced arms programs such as the F-35 joint task fighter, the Russians are extremely stingy with their defense rubles, getting as much as 10 times the bang for the buck compared to the bloated US defense industry. While it is true that the Russian economy has suffered from low energy prices, it is far from being in shambles, and a return to growth is expected as early as next year. Senator John McCain once called Russia "A gas station masquerading as a country." Well, he lied. Yes, Russia is the world’s largest oil producer and second-largest oil exporter, but it is also world’s largest exporter of grain and nuclear power technology. It is as advanced and sophisticated a society as the United States. Russia’s armed forces, both conventional and nuclear, are now ready to fight, and they are more than a match for the US and NATO, especially if a war erupts anywhere near the Russian border.

But such a fight would be suicidal for all sides. We strongly believe that a conventional war in Europe runs a strong chance of turning nuclear very rapidly, and that any US/NATO nuclear strike on Russian forces or territory will automatically trigger a retaliatory Russian nuclear strike on the continental US. Contrary to irresponsible statements made by some American propagandists, American antiballistic missile systems are incapable of shielding the American people from a Russian nuclear strike. Russia has the means to strike at targets in the USA with long-range nuclear as well as conventional weapons.

The sole reason why the USA and Russia have found themselves on a collision course, instead of defusing tensions and cooperating on a wide range of international problems, is the stubborn refusal by the US leadership to accept Russia as an equal partner: Washington is dead set on being the "world leader" and the "indispensable nation," even as its influence steadily dwindles in the wake of a string of foreign policy and military disasters such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen and the Ukraine. Continued American global leadership is something that neither Russia, nor China, nor most of the other countries are willing to accept. This gradual but apparent loss of power and influence has caused the US leadership to become hysterical; and it is but a small step from hysterical to suicidal. America’s political leaders need to be placed under suicide watch.

First and foremost, we are appealing to the commanders of the US Armed Forces to follow the example of Admiral William Fallon, who, when asked about a war with Iran, reportedly replied "not on my watch." We know that you are not suicidal, and that you do not wish to die for the sake of out-of-touch imperial hubris. If possible, please tell your staff, colleagues and, especially, your civilian superiors that a war with Russia will not happen on your watch. At the very least, take that pledge yourselves, and, should the day ever come when the suicidal order is issued, refuse to execute it on the grounds that it is criminal. Remember that according to the Nuremberg Tribunal "To initiate a war of aggression… is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." Since Nuremberg, "I was just following orders" is no longer a valid defense; please don’t be war criminals.

We also appeal to the American people to take peaceful but forceful action to oppose any politician or party that engages in irresponsible, provocative Russia-baiting, and that condones and supports a policy of needless confrontation with a nuclear superpower that is capable of destroying America in about an hour. Speak up, break through the barrier of mass media propaganda, and make your fellow Americans aware of the immense danger of a confrontation between Russia and the US.

There is no objective reason why US and Russia should consider each other adversaries. The current confrontation is entirely the result of the extremist views of the neoconservative cult, whose members were allowed to infiltrate the US Federal government under President Bill Clinton, and who consider any country that refuses to obey their dictates as an enemy to be crushed. Thanks to their tireless efforts, over a million innocent people have already died in the former Yugoslavia, in Afghanistan, in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Pakistan, the Ukraine, Yemen, Somalia and in many other countries—all because of their maniacal insistence that the USA must be a world empire, not a just a regular, normal country, and that every national leader must either bow down before them, or be overthrown. In Russia, this irresistible force has finally encountered an immovable object. They must be forced to back down before they destroy us all.

We are absolutely and categorically certain that Russia will never attack the US, nor any EU member state, that Russia is not at all interested in recreating the USSR, and that there is no "Russian threat" or "Russian aggression." Much of Russia’s recent economic success has a lot to do with the shedding of former Soviet dependencies, allowing her to pursue a "Russia first" policy. But we are just as certain that if Russia is attacked, or even threatened with attack, she will not back down, and that the Russian leadership will not "blink." With great sadness and a heavy heart they will do their sworn duty and unleash a nuclear barrage from which the United States will never recover. Even if the entire Russian leadership is killed in a first strike, the so-called "Dead Hand" (the "Perimetr" system) will automatically launch enough nukes to wipe the USA off the political map. We feel that it is our duty to do all we can to prevent such a catastrophe.


SOURCE: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1205797702764485&id=226997970644468


Trump Would Renogotiate Paris

Climate Agreement

 “I’m not a believer in man-made global warming,” says Trump.

Three cheers for Trump!


In an interview with Reuters, Republican presidential contender Donald Trump threw climate alarmists into a tizzy by saying he would renegotiate the conditions for America’s involvement in the United Nations’ global climate accord reached in Paris in December 2015.

It’s no secret Trump is a climate skeptic. In an appearance on The Hugh Hewitt Show, Trump said, “I’m not a believer in man-made global warming. I mean, Obama thinks it’s the number-one problem of the world today, and I think it’s very low on the list – we have much bigger problems.” Trump is also no fan of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), on the stump promising to cut its budget dramatically and review all its regulations, eliminating many because, Over-regulation presents one of the greatest barriers to entry into markets and one of the greatest costs to businesses that are trying to stay competitive.

Trump’s views on the Paris climate treaty thus should come as little surprise. “I will be looking at that [the Paris climate agreement] very, very seriously, and at a minimum I will be renegotiating those agreements, at a minimum,” the billionaire developer told Reuters.

“[T]hose agreements are one-sided agreements and they are bad for the United States,” Trump said, adding he does not believe China, the world’s top emitter of carbon dioxide, would adhere to its pledge under the Paris deal.

“Not a big fan because other countries don’t adhere to it, and China doesn’t adhere to it, and China’s spewing into the atmosphere.”

The Obama administration pledged a 26 to 28 percent domestic reduction in greenhouse gases by 2025 compared to 2005, while China’s emissions will continue to grow unabated at least until 2030, when it believes its emissions will plateau.

The United States is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases. If Trump pulls the United States out of the agreement, it could mean the end of the accord.

Former French foreign minister Laurent Fabius, who helped broker the deal, said in early May the U.S. election was critical to the agreement’s future. “If a climate change denier was to be elected, it would threaten dramatically global action against climate disruption,” Fabius said.

Built into the Paris agreement is a provision meant to keep countries in the accord in the event a new government comes in and wants to withdraw. The clause says any nation wanting to withdraw will first have to wait four years.

However, no country is bound by the agreement unless it actually legally adopts the accord – that is, until the accord has been ratified by the country’s government body. Congress has not ratified the Paris accord, and so the United States can drop out.

In addition, since there are no legally binding penalties for not adopting or dropping out of the treaty, or for a country missing its climate targets, moral suasion is the only tool member countries would have to keep in the Paris agreement countries that wish to withdraw.

Good luck with that!

— H. Sterling Burnett

SOURCE: Reuters


The Manufactured Divide - Elite Suffers A Devastating Blow And It Is About To Get Worse For Them

11/05/16 SOURCE:- (http://allnewspipeline.com/The_Manufactured_Divide.php)

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

A look at the most talked (or written) about political news articles on any given day would have us believe that the Republican party is in shambles, completely divided over the rise of Donald Trump as the GOP Presumptive Nominee for President, where sites that track political news and who is talking about what, are full of articles on how Cruz backers are donating to Hillary Clinton, and how Cruz is not releasing his delegates before the July GOP convention, and the die-hard #NeverTrumpster pundits, aka the political class establishment backers, continue to bemoan the will of the voters, who for once did not allow those same pundits and political "elite" select the GOP candidate and instead chose for themselves.

In fact one of the most ironic screeds of the day comes from The Weekly Standard, who has been leading the #NeverTrump charge since day one and concludes their daily rant by calling Republicans prepared to unite behind Trump now that he is the last man standing out of the 17 original GOP candidates, a bunch of "unprincipled sellouts."

And now he will be the Republican party's nominee for president. Reince Priebus, the party's chairman, called for Republicans to unite around Trump and rally to his cause. One by one they fell in line—the unprincipled sellouts, the rising stars, the veteran officeholders, the would-be nominees. Jon Huntsman and Rick Scott. Nikki Haley and Brian Sandoval. Rob Portman and Kelly Ayotte. Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal.

The reason this particular "establishment" pundit screed is so ironic is because this is the same publication that lectured voters that did not think John McCain was the best candidate in 2008 to "Let's Grow Up, Conservatives"  and "defeat the Democrats in November." The same publication that wrote, just a day before the 2012 Presidential elections all the reasons why, in their not-so-humble-we-are-the-political-geniuses" opinion, "Why Romney Will Win."

In case they need a reminder, the candidates that were shoved down Americans throats, the politically elite "selected".... lost in 2008 and in 2012.

Perhaps someone should send them a little note to "Grow Up, Conservative and defeat the Democrats (Hillary Clinton) in November 2016."

The point here being it is to the media's benefit to hype the "divide" in the Republican and Democratic parties because without controversary, they won't have readers, but they are being given plenty of material by the #NeverTrump crybabies that believe voters that disagree with them are too stupid to actually vote because... well... they are the pundits and voters are just people who, unfortunately for those oh-so-brilliant establishment-backing pundits, are allowed to vote and each one of the "peoples" votes count every bit as much as those of the pundits.

Which is where we find out that the "big divide" is manufactured, perpetuated by the #NeverTrumpsters, but still manufactured as a new Gallup survey finds that "rank and file Republicans," those not of the political class, are much less divided than the MSM and the political class would like us to believe:

We also have interesting data collected this past weekend on vote intentions. Seventy-one percent of Republicans said they would be likely to vote for Trump, with 21% ruling it out. Clinton? Among Democrats, 73% said they would be likely to vote for her, with 21% ruling it out. So, in terms of vote projection at this point, Trump is no more dividing the Republican Party than Clinton is dividing the Democratic Party. The same percent of partisans say they will not vote for their party's front-runner.

This suggests that Trump is not in as unusual a position as some might think. We need to be somewhat cautious in assuming that Republicans across the nation are riven by a devastating rift because of divided emotions about Trump. The significant majority of Republicans, in fact, apparently like Trump and say they are likely to vote for him, and Trump's image is only marginally more divisive among Republicans than Clinton's is among Democrats. 

While poll numbers change, what they are good for is to get a feel of what "voters" are thinking rather than what the media is focusing on as to what the political "elite" establishment is thinking.

If this Republican primary season has taught us anything at all... it is that ordinary voters no longer care what the establishment thinks, wants, or tells us to do.

Laura Ingraham has an absolutely must-read article titled "Trump v. Clinton … and Bush," with a subheader of "As NeverTrumpers plot away, a reality check is in order," in which she does a great job detailing the differences between Trump and Clinton and Bush, focusing more on conservative priorities, but it is at the end of her article where we see the mindset that she seems to share with the majority of the "rank-and-file Republicans" spoken of in the Gallup survey.

During the American Revolution, the Patriots had a simple slogan: Join or Die. Not “Join, and We’ll All Be Happy.” Not “Join, and We’ll Build a Great Country.” Not “Join, and We’ll All Stick to Our Principles.” No: Join or Die. They knew working together would hurt. They knew the inevitable compromises would bother their conscience. They knew that they wouldn’t get the country they really wanted. But they also understood — much more than we do — that life is hard, and it’s often unfair.

In Federalist 51, James Madison wrote: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” But men are not angels. We are flawed, and taking politics seriously means agreeing to deals you don’t like.

To that end, those of us who will be voting for Trump are willing to work with all people of good faith to stop Hillary Clinton, and reclaim American sovereignty. If you don’t want to help us, we’ll understand. But we’ll never stop trying to help you.

The #NeverTrump political class, the establishment and die-hard Ted Cruz supporters still going through the five stages of grief after Cruz suspended his campaign, troll political threads that are supportive of Trump, accusing supporters of refusing to see his flaws, putting him on a pedestal or thinking he is a God,  all claims we have seen here at ANP and across the Internet in comment sections, yet those same critics ignore the fact that Trump, whom Cruz once called a "force of nature," has figuratively run over each and every one of the other 16 candidates as proven by each one dropping out of the race before the last of the primaries have even occurred.

That doesn't make Trump without flaws, it doesn't put him on a pedestal and it certainly doesn't make him anyone's god, what it does is acknowledge reality, which is that Trump is the the last man standing after a brutal primary season and the person that knocked 16 other GOP candidates out of the race and, more importantly, that is not a career politician, not a member of the political class.

Donald Trump is the person standing between Hillary Clinton and the White House.

The American Thinker concludes an article published this morning with a statement which encompasses exactly what the political class should be doing right now in order to keep Hillary out of the White House:

Donald Trump is speaking to what has become vestigial folk memory in Fishtown about what this country is, what it has done and what it is capable of doing again. In his undisciplined, meandering rhetorical style, Trump exhibits no fluency in the language of classical liberalism or the American Creed, because he is not a native speaker. Instead, Trump evokes rough virtues once universally celebrated there -- at least until Fishtown men stopped wearing ties to funerals. Of course these are John Ford’s, William Wellman’s, Frank Capra’s or John Milius’ truths rather than Frederich von Hayek’s, but so what? Trump is offering nothing more nuanced than the Marseillaise scene at Rick’s. It is just as sloppily jejune, but it speaks successfully to people untouched thus far by National Review or The Weekly Standard, and hitherto given up entirely by the political class to TMZ. If Trumpismo can spark their political re-engagement then it creates the opportunity to persuade them to embrace the serious, and potentially painful, policy reforms and personal renewal necessary to begin returning this nation to security and prosperity. Rather than fear their reaction, political leaders can once again enlist their energy and renewed faith in America. Instead of deprecating a chance to rebuild social capital, politicians and opinion leaders worthy of the name ought to be prepared to run to the front of the parade and guide it.

Trumpismo may turn out to be a better political opportunity than a pathetic Republican leadership class deserves.

Well said.


Instead of telling the general public what is best for them, the political class, the establishment "elite," need to make a choice... Trump or Clinton.... then live with their choice because if they continue with their antics, their temper tantrums and continue to give the MSM the manufactured divide narrative, we the people, will hold them accountable if Hillary Clinton takes the White House.

The so-called "elite" have suffered a devastating blow and it is about to get much worse for them if they do not sit down, shut up, and get out of Americans way. 

As Rick Perry explains below... it comes down to priorities.

May 6, 2016

New World Order Warns Of 'Terrible News' For America And The World - Donald Trump NWO 'Enemy Number 1' - False Flag Warning Into 2017 As NWO Panics

By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die

Back on October 9th of 2015, ANP published a story in which we asked if the mysterious card seen (below left) from the 'Illuminati Card Game' hinted at an upcoming political assassination attempt upon Donald Trump, who was then only ahead in the polls and considered by most Republican insiders to be way too far outside of the mainstream to have a chance at the nomination. ANP readers immediately noticed the resemblance of the card to Donald Trump. The final video below looks at  the interesting 'coincidences' between the cards from the 'illuminati card game,' and the 'enough is enough' card in particular, and events that have unfolded in real life. 

Now nearly 7 months later, Trump has presumably wrapped up the Republican nomination with all remaining foes dropping out of the race, leaving him the last-man standing and seemingly in the position to help America 'overthrow' the 'New World Order' and the globalism that he recently warned us about that is reeking havoc upon Americans jobs, our national sovereignty and certainly our security with a revolving door into the country now wide open.

A brand new story from the 'nwo-tied' The Economist magazine today helps to tell this story from an 'elite' point of view. Called "Fear Trumps Hope" with a subtitle of "
Donald Trump is going to be the Republican candidate for the presidency. This is terrible news for Republicans, America and the world", it's easy to see why the NWO has Trump labeled as their 'enemy #1' and as we learn in the newly released videos below, will likely do ANYTHING at all to stop him and his plans for an "America Great Again".

In turn, The Economist story also tells us that Trump is thinking about getting the US out of the United Nations, great news for anyone paying attention to what the globalists have planned for America including disarmament and the gutting of the 2nd Amendment and global government with a loss of national sovereignty and rapidly dwindling rights for Americans with no Constitutional guarantees.

As former Clinton aide Larry Nichols tells Greg Hunter in this new story on USAWatchdog, a 'silent coup' led by FEMA is beginning to take over America at this very moment that seeks to install Barack Obama as 'king'. With only a general election now standing in between Trump and the White House, what else does the 'new world order' have planned for America? What the globalists call 'terrible news' is great news to most 'awake' Americans! Why the disconnect? It's now quite clear, only Donald Trump can stop their plans for a 'new world order'. What will they do to stop him? 


As Susan Duclos wrote in a recent story soon after Trump had seemingly guaranteed the nomination, do we really expect the 'elite' to give up power as simply as that? While the 'nwo' still has a donkey in the race in the person of Hillary Clinton, it's becoming more and more clear that Trump will absolutely destroy Hillary if she is the last donkey standing in the Democratic race, a prospect still not guaranteed with a possible indictment in her future and Sanders supporters threatening to vote for #AnybodyButHillary, even Donald Trump. Even the Washington Post sees the writing on the wall for Shill

With Hillary quite possibly the only thing standing between Donald Trump and the White House and a 'new world order' and her campaign in freefall while the Trump juggernaut surges onward, gaining millions of supporters along the way who realize if it's between Hillary and 'the Donald', it's a no-brainer, more and more people are warning of a major 'false flag' event of some sort between now and the election as the only way to possibly stop Trump as heard in the videos below.

Back in March we told you that we have 'reached the rubicon crossing' with many 'Republican elitists' turning against Trump while promising to vote for Hillary instead. We continue to see who's still lining up against Trump, including two former Republican presidents in the Bush father and son combo who recently stated that they wouldn't be endorsing Trump, as a very good sign that Trump won't be letting America down like our last 4 'new world order' bound presidents have.  

In the 1st two videos below from Alex Jones over at Infowars and Mike Adams from Natural News and Trump.News, we hear from two alternative media personalities who have the same gut feeling that we do here at ANP, the NWO will do ANYTHING at all to stay in power and control, even if that means completely tearing America down and putting the final stake within our collective hearts. 

Whether via a 'Kennedy-style' assassination attempt, massive riots that force the cancelling of the election, EMP, nuclear war, economic collapse or something else totally, we believe that Americans need to stay dilligent through 2017 as absolutely anything is possible and there is no doubt that the NWO will do anything at all to bring us down. As we learn in the 3rd video below, "we're facing the most evil people the world has ever seen."  


By Lisa Haven

I’ve about had it with outlets that continually lie, manipulate, and abuse the masses for their own gain. Specifically Facebook and countless others working towards the elite agenda with little recourse about the impact they are having on humanity so long as their pockets are filled with money.

It’s time for us Americans to take a stand against such groups and make our voices heard. If we continue to allow these manipulative giants to rule over us then we can kiss our freedoms goodbye. I for one, won’t stand by and let it happen. I will share what they are doing with everyone and anyone willing to listen. I will no longer allow them to rule over me in such a manner that they know every jot and tittle about my life and I believe you feel the same way.

Here is the breaking report…

**If I get banned or this post gets banned from Facebook then every single one of you will know why and also know without a doubt that Facebook is run by government slaves hell-bent on collecting our private data.


That said, if by now you haven’t figured out that Facebook is in cahoots with the government, then I feel for you but for those who are well aware of the issues it’s high time you readied yourself to switch over to Seen.life, which will be available this Thursday, December 3rd. It is a BRAND NEW site that is similar to Facebook but without all the censorship crap.

Here are some of the differences you’ll find at Seen.Life:

No censorship!  Keep in mind they do have a Terms of Service that will need to be followed for things like pornography, copyright violations and defamation.  If we receive a complaint, we’ll investigate.  If you are accustomed to the freewheeling style at Before It’s News, we think you’ll enjoy Seen.is

NO ID required. Facebook is now asking certain people for their ID’s.  That’s beyond the pale. You can use whatever name you’d like at Seen and no ID required.

They won’t sell your data, in fact we don’t even collect it (other than your email so you can receive notifications).  It’s hosted in Iceland and selling data isn’t allowed there.  A very good reason to go visit Iceland.  A lot of very friendly people there, too.

No limit to your account’s friends. If you’re popular enough to get over 5,000 friends, we think that’s great!  More power to you!

Private and secure chat rooms! These are strongly encrypted and there’s no snooping.

With the way Facebook is headed it’s not going to be a place you want to stay. Sign up and create an account at Seen.Life (Which will be available December 3rd) and get away from this invasive censorship!

I was very recently wondering about MICROSOFT 10, because I kept being prompted on my computer to download MICROSOFT 10 for free!


INTRODUCTION: by Steve author of this website

I immediately thought that was very odd, as I had to pay good money for the last upgrade of MICROSOFT WINDOWS.  Thank God I have repeated declined to download MICRSOFT WINDOWS 10. Now I am warning others and kindly ask you to please pass on this information to everyone that you know, and beyond. THANKS.

My suspicions were confirmed, when I read the following article, which I think we should all take very seriously; as it appears that BIG BROTHER wants to get his camera inside our home, as well as a whole bunch of “listening devices” into your computer.     

From the following article it would appear that MICROSOFT has just betrayed us all to NSA!



NSA Partner in Crime? Microsoft Admits Windows 10 Auto-Spying Can’t Be Disabled

NOVEMBER 4, 2015


Much has been made about NSA spying and bulk data collection of American citizens, as well as an increasing loss of privacy in the face of the new digital Big Brother State – but amazingly, few are really aware of the fact that even the NSA needs working partners in crime to carry out their assault on American freedoms guaranteed in the US Constitution, specifically those enshrined in the 4th Amendment.

One such partner in crime appears to be Microsoft Corporation based in Redmond, near Seattle. Upon further examination, it appears that Microsoft’s new “operating” (policing) system, Windows 10, has given itself permission to watch your every move through its built-in spying feature.

You have to ask yourself: how out of touch is Microsoft that, in light of the Edward Snowden revelations and the rest too – that it would have the outright gall to build a back door into its latest OS and make it a nonnegotiable clause in the customer’s the Terms and Conditions?

Techworm confirms the brazen move by Gatestown product engineers:

“As more and more users are jumping the queue to download the Windows 10 through the Windows Insider Program, almost all of them have forgotten to check the Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions users accept while downloading the Windows 10. If you study the privacy policy you will be startled at the amount of freedom you are giving Microsoft to spy on you.”

According to its Terms and Conditions, Microsoft has all but invited itself into your private domain 24/7:

“Microsoft collects information about you, your devices, applications and networks, and your use of those devices, applications and networks. Examples of data we collect include your name, email address, preferences and interests; browsing, search and file history; phone call and SMS data; device configuration and sensor data; and application usage.”

According the Forbes writer Gordon Kelly, “.. despite offering some options to turn elements of tracking off, core data collection simply cannot be stopped.”

Speaking to PC World, Microsoft VP Joe Belfiore admitted, “In the cases where we’ve not provided options, we feel that those things have to do with the health of the system,” he said. “In the case of knowing that our system that we’ve created is crashing, or is having serious performance problems, we view that as so helpful to the ecosystem and so not an issue of personal privacy, that today we collect that data so that we make that experience better for everyone.”

Now you have to ask yourself the question: how tight is Microsoft’s top brass with spy chiefs at the NSA?

Earlier this summer, we learned how NSA spying relies on AT&T’s “extreme willingness to help”, which should give us an idea of the scale of corporate collusion with the NSA.

In the wake of the early Snowden releases, The Guardian laid the foundation to this narrative:

“One slide in the undated PowerPoint presentation, published as part of the Guardian’s NSA Files: Decoded project, illustrates the number of intelligence reports being generated from data collected from the companies. In the five weeks from June 5 2010, the period covered by the document, data from Yahoo generated by far the most reports, followed by Microsoft and then Google. Between them, the three companies accounted for more than 2,000 reports in that period – all but a tiny fraction of the total produced under one of the NSA’s main foreign intelligence authorities, the Fisa Amendments Act (FAA).”

In addition to all this, you have the issue of whether or not Microsoft has embedded a heavy-handed ‘TPP‘ backdoor access clause in its privacy terms as well. The following was brought to light by a Reddit user recently:

“Here is there Privacy Statement where they state:

Finally, we will access, disclose and preserve personal data, including your content (such as the content of your emails, other private communications or files in private folders), when we have a good faith belief that doing so is necessary to:

  1. 1.    comply with applicable law or respond to valid legal process, including from law enforcement or other government agencies;
  2. 2.    protect our customers, for example to prevent spam or attempts to defraud users of the services, or to help prevent the loss of life or serious injury of anyone;
  3. 3.    operate and maintain the security of our services, including to prevent or stop an attack on our computer systems or networks; or
  4. 4.    protect the rights or property of Microsoft, including enforcing the terms governing the use of the services – however, if we receive information indicating that someone is using our services to traffic in stolen intellectual or physical property of Microsoft, we will not inspect a customer’s private content ourselves, but we may refer the matter to law enforcement.

Yeah I don’t want to give them access to ANY of my hard drives contents. Is there any way to turn this off?”

So, Microsoft has been at it for quite sometime.

Considering how this company has enjoyed a license to print money since the late 1980’s, you would think that they would be more appreciative of the millions of customers who have made so many millionaires, and billionaires in Seattle and beyond. You’d think that Microsoft might just stand up for the privacy of the little man, right?

You’d think so, but then again… you might be wrong.


Twitter Characterizes Disagreeing with Someone’s Opinion As “Abusive Behavior"


Via Infowars.com

Twitter is now allowing users to report other account holders for “engaging in abusive or harassing behavior,” one example of which includes “disagreement with my opinion.”

The chilling language was discovered just days after top feminists went before the United Nations and called on the global body to pressure governments to censor content critical of radical feminism.

Twitter’s official page for reporting harassment and abuse gives users a number of options that characterize the nature of the “abuse”.

One of the options is Twitter posts that are, “Offensive, disrespectful or in disagreement with my opinion.”

Users are then invited to provide the user ID of the account holder they are reporting, as well as further evidence of such “abuse”.

Obviously, the notion that merely disagreeing with someone’s opinion constitutes an act of “abuse” or “harassment” is completely anathema to free speech. The mere fact that this option exists should set alarm bells ringing for those who have warned of an authoritarian purge that threatens to silence voices of dissent on social media.

However, Twitter’s characterization of criticism or disagreement as “abuse” will bring a smile to the face of many prominent feminists.

Comments by Stephen N Strutt  06/10/15 :-


"NEWSSPEAK" "THOUGHT POLICE" & "THE MINISTRY OF TRUTH",where the old definitions of WORDS are ALTERED. Think of it sensibly for one moment.

If everyone who DISAGREED with the OPINION of another person was categorized as ABUSIVE, then I dare-say that there would not be left one person on the planet who would not be CRIMINALIZED by this DEFINITION of what is NOW considered ABUSIVE!


So many crazy ideas have been thrown out there on the airwaves of the main media over the last several years. One example some years ago. The idea was put forward by some prominent MP that we must stop celebrating CHRISTMAS in the UK, as it could be an offense to the Muslims. Fortunately the idea was dismissed  as CRAZY both by the Muslims themselves, and the general public in the UK.

All mentioned in the “TWITTER ABUSE” article above is designed to CHANGE the DEFINITION of WHAT is RIGHT & WRONG, and which is of course, paving the way to TOTAL CONTROL over ALL of the citizens of earth. To the point where one is afraid to say ANYTHING, as it might offend someone or the government, and bring some sort of RETRIBUTION.

Just think of OPPRESSIVE REGIMES OF MAN in the recent past, and for how small or ridiculous mistakes, error or even trumped up charges, one could be called to account.

Under the NAZIS from 1933- 1945 millions were arrested and fed to the GAS CHAMBERS. What were the crimes of these innocent peoples? 

THE elite always are the ones manufacturing the PROBLEM- REACTION- SOLUTION formula.

The Problem today for the ELITE, is the fact that in their eyes there are currently just too many "useless eaters" on the planet, and that 95% need to be culled one way or the other. Their sayings not mine.

One method to help along this road of EUGENICS, is NEWSSPEAK: Change the definition of words and confuse the masses into total submission or you will be arrested for some trumped-up crime.

During the COMMUNIST era in Russia, from 1917-1989, 50 million people were executed. From the nineteen forties onwards through the great CURTURAL PURGES in CHINA, 70 million people were killed.  What were their crimes? Don’t think for a moment that all crimes against the state are necessarily RELIGIOUS OR POLITICAL. Maybe all of the victims simply had a different OPINION?

Once a TOTALITARIAN ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT is in place, one could be arrested and disappear on the slightest pretext, or doubt about your LOYALTY to being THEIR willing slave.

Better to STAND UP now while we still have the FREEDOM to do so, and continue to have your own OPINIONS. Stand up & FIGHT for the TRUTH against the LIES in all aspects of society, as a very powerful minority are trying to deliberately disintegrate ALL DECENT MORAL VALUES, of which the above seeming insignificant article is far more insidious and dangerous than at first meets the eye.

An article which doubtless most people will just smile at, and dismiss as a joke. 

It has just been told to me that FACE-BOOK recently tried to implement the exact same control mechanism as mentioned in the above article. It was suggested to incorporate a DISLIKE button on FACE-BOOK for those who don't AGREE with your OPINION. So far in the case of FACE-BOOK it has not YET been implemented.

But how long until total control sets in on the entire INTERNET?





By NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
October 2, 2015
© 2015 NewsWithViews.com

About one week after telling the American people he would not be a guest on Fox News Channel shows for the foreseeable future,” GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump is scheduled to appear on “The O’Reilly Factor,” according to news reports circulating throughout the Internet and the real world.

The reason for Mr. Trump's change of heart is the simple fact that out of all members of the giant news media complex, Bill O'Reilly and a few others have been blasting reporters and editors for their scandalous attacks on the real-estate tycoon. While not a favorite of the conservatives and Tea Party movement, O'Reilly often finds himself in complete agreement with true conservatives.

The vast majority of the denizens of American newsrooms, especially the national organizations such as CBS, NBC, CNN and others, have given up all pretense of unbiased reportage.

Simply put, they despise Donald Trump. He has no fear of them and in fact when reporters take their potshots at him, he shoots back. His style includes a deep-seeded hatred for political correctness and attacks such as Fox News Channel's Megyn Kelly don't intimidate him to mince words or play word games to avoid negative press.

Because Trump doesn't fear them or worry about offend their sensibilities, new media figures believe it's their jobs to punish Trump for being his refusal to kowtow to them.

Their vitriol is all the more pronounced because most working in news media are left-of-center therefore they hate his political philosophy and will attempt to hurt him any way they can, according to political strategist Michael Baker.

"I'm always amazed at what former CBS News correspondent Bernard Goldberg has said: 'the news media are corrupt.' And I believe he was holding back. I would personally say the news media are involved in criminal conspiracies with their friends -- and co-workers -- in the Democratic Party," said Baker.

Trump has been under intense attack from the Republican establishment, the Democrats and the news media, sometimes all of them joining together in their zeal to hurt his political aspirations. In fact, members of the news media will seek to gauge just how much damage they can inflict on the Trump campaign. "What they do is run a negative news story about Trump or someone close to the Trump campaign, and then once the story 'has legs' the news organizations will have a pollster conduct a survey to see how much damage they did to Trump's campaign," said Charles Rothberger, a former police public information officer (PIO).

Trump himself has remarked about how reporters have focused on his poll numbers rather than highlighting that he dominates "every poll nationwide … and every state.

"He doesn't understand why photographers snapped images of rows of empty chairs at his speech at a business convention in South Carolina on Wednesday afternoon, especially when a town hall that evening was packed. He doesn't understand why some of his opponents are criticizing him for not providing specific answers to foreign policy questions, since he doesn't think a potential president should share such information," wrote Jenna Johnson of the Washington Post.

"The press is a very powerful force in America given special privilege by the Founding Fathers. And, if the press deems someone unworthy they will try to destroy that person. That’s where Donald Trump finds himself today," said Ms. Johnson.


And Fox News' Bill O'Reilly agrees: "Unfortunately the American media, although there are exceptions, are not looking out for you. They have an agenda, these people. And they often use that agenda in corrupt ways. You as a media consumer should walk away when you see that happen."

"[T]hat's what happens when the vast majority in media aligns itself with one party against half of the country. Only an idiot or a liar would suggest that the media is biased against liberals. The media has always leaned left, but in the age of Obama they have staged an outright war on right leaning Americans," according to talk radio host and blogger Gunny G.

In the ongoing feud between FNC's Megyn Kelly and Donald Trump, his reaction was really a slam at a Democratic Party political strategy. The Democrats created a non-existent “War on Women” and the media perpetuated the lie every step of the way to help Hillary Clinton taking attention away from her numerous misdeeds.