Edward Snowden immediately hailed the decision, pointing out significant passages from the court to his millions of Twitter followers. Of particular importance - and, indeed, at the heart of both known and potentially unknown domestic spy programs - remains the impossible reckoning between Fourth Amendment protections and the government’s claims of a national security imperative.

Though Leon’s judgment arrives mere weeks before metadata collection would naturally end under the USA Patriot Act’s Section 215 upon implementation of the newly passed USA Freedom Act, he emphasized potential implications of any undue delay in bringing such spying to a close, stating:

In other words, the judge harshly repudiated the government’s already poorly disguised emphasis on national security to justify bulk collection as wholly secondary to the individual’s right to privacy under the Constitution.

Leon’s 2013 ruling was struck down in August this year, when an appeals court found the plaintiff in Klayman v. Obama had not established the legal standing necessary to dispute the constitutionality of the NSA program. Once amended appropriately, the judge was able to make a ruling on the original case and issue an injunction to halt bulk collection.

In this ruling, Leon sharply admonished the appeals court for its reversal, saying:

Seemingly irritated at the insult of the government maintaining its position on the necessity of bulk collection while ignoring the preceding twenty-two months to find less invasive means to achieve the same goal, Leon searingly stated:

Pointing out the painfully obvious, Leon derided fictitious claims the government needs bulk data collection at all, considering the program thwarted exactly zero terror attacks throughout its entire duration. In rebuttal to claims the contentious NSA program remains reasonably effective, the judge flatly stated:

Pulling no punches, Leon concludes with a scathing challenge to the naïveté and blind acceptance Congress mistakenly presumed the public and court would give the contentiously invasive program:

Employing linguistic subtlety which, at times, borders on a verbal smackdown, Judge Richard Leon brilliantly sent the NSA, Congress, and rest of the government a message that couldn’t be denied this second time around: Nobody buys your bullshit.

Creating considerable dissent with the status quo and more specifically with The Federal Reserve and C.I.A., Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110 into law on June 4th, 1963, which gave the president the right to issue gold-backed currency, and completely without permission from The Federal Reserve. But where was Kennedy going to receive such large amounts of gold to back a new Treasury note?

A Little History

In the 1930's, royal Asian families had seen that some of their gold and silver holdings in Southeast Asia were being plundered by the Japanese and needed to do something about it. In 1938, the Chinese Kuomintang government sent 7 warships loaded with gold and silver to the US Federal Reserve for safekeeping.

In return, the Chinese were given 60 year gold bonds–a subject we will return to further down. A few years later in 1944, the infamous Bretton Woods Conference took place in which the US, France and Britain were given a 50 year mandate to modernize and transform the world for the better. Backing this new global financial system that had just been set up was a now estimated 2 million metric tons of gold, held by this group of royal Asian families, which is also known as the Dragon Family.

By August 17th, 1945, President Soekarno of Indonesia had been elected “M1″ or Monetary Controller of this large cache of assets, granted under  United Nations Resolution MISA 81704, Operation Heavy Freedom. 

These assets are better known as the Global Collateral Accounts and were originally intended to be used for the modernization of the world through several humanitarian projects. The Dragon Family are the legitimate Depositors of these accounts.

By 1955, it was shown that the International Monetary Fund, which was also created at Bretton Woods, was not living up to its word and was instead serving only the interest of the banking and political elite. It was at this time that a growing alliance began to see that these funds were being used to fuel the Cold War tension and decided to strongly oppose the shady banking cabal.

By 1963, this alliance pooled their financial resources together to create the Green Hilton Memorial Agreement, which was signed by John F. Kennedy and President Skoearno and was finished on November 14, 1963.

This agreement was to utilize the Global Collateral Accounts for global development and humanitarian projects (along with a new US Treasury Note, a new supernational/international note backed by gold and would bring an end to The Federal Reserve system and the CIA). Just 8 days later, JFK was assassinated.

The above pictures show The Green Hilton Memorial Agreement and signatures of President Soekarno and President John F. Kennedy along with several others with listed amounts of gold-backed certificates. 

A short time following Kennedy’s passing, President Soekarno was driven from power by way of a coup. By 1968, the Bush, Kissinger, Rockefeller and other influential families created a fake heir to the rights of the Global Collateral Accounts. Up until the writing of this article in November of 2015, these accounts have been illegally and fraudulently used by the central banking system.

The 9/11 Connection

In 1998, 60 years after the Federal Reserve Board and the Chinese swapped gold for gold bonds, the Chinese requested their gold back. After refusal from the Fed, the Chinese Kuomintang government followed with a lawsuit. The International Court of Justice ruled that the Fed needed to return the gold, which was later agreed upon by the Fed. The first payment was scheduled to be delivered September 12th, 2001.

Interestingly, on September 10th, 2001, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced that 2.3 trillion dollars went missing from the Pentagon defense budget. Even more conspicuous, Cantor Fitzgerald Securities, the company that was handling the paper work for the gold to be delivered back to the Chinese, was inside One World Trade Center on floors 101-105. All 658 of their employees were murdered on that day as the towers fell and the gold was not returned to the Chinese.

The Monaco Accords, The Trillion Dollar Lawsuit and the BRICS

In August of 2011, representatives from 57 nations (none were invited from the West) came together off the coast of Monaco to create an alliance designed to legally take down the central banking cabal and create a new global financial system using the Global Collateral Accounts for many development and humanitarian projects.

Neil Keenan (right) with Count Albert of the Dragon Family

Reports from Neil Keenan, who helped arrange this historic meeting and has been entrusted with protecting and restoring the legal rights back to the Dragon Family and settling the Global Collateral Accounts for the benefit of humanity, has stated that this Monaco meeting alliance has now swelled to 182 countries and is being spearheaded by the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).

Neil also filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of New York on November 23, 2011 to the tune of over a trillion dollars against the United Nations, the Office of International Treasury Control, Silvio Berlusconi, Ban Ki-Moon, the World Economic Forum and several others.

For those that want proof of this lawsuit, here is a screenshot of the filed case. This comes from pacer.gov, which is used to look up filed cases. Take a look at the plaintiff and defendants.

Since that time, Neil has withdrawn the suit (Obama’s economic advisor’s brother became the judge and he previously had never been a judge before) to refile in an even more effective jurisdiction and plans to do this in the very near future. This new lawsuit will be bigger and will expose the EU, the Federal Reserve and all the parties mentioned above, plus much more.

Neil Keenan has also filed liens and a Cease and Desist order against all twelve central banks in the U.S. and a Cease and Desist order on behalf of the Dragon Family against names like Queen Elizabeth II, Hilary Clinton, George Herbert Walker Bush, George W. Bush, David Rockefeller and several other well known names.

Above is the official Cease and Desist order. To download this pdf file, click here

Is Our World to Be Set Free? 

Is this massive alliance about to make it’s move on the banking and political cabal? Is Neil Keenan and his team about to finish what JFK, President Sukarno and many others were trying to accomplish? Will the 9/11 connection to the Global Collateral Accounts finally come to light? To these questions, Neil Keenan has a statement for the world:

This provoked wider criticism of traditional media from Darvall.

Darvall then hailed the internet as the bastion of real media.

He specified social media as the future of of news.

He said this of his own career:

And left us with a piece of advice:

Can we trust the BBC?

The BBC is the envy of much of the world: a media free from vested interest; free to serve the public for the greater good. We observe the likes of Fox News in the USA and are thankful. A properly informed public is the foundation of any meaningful democracy, and a publicly owned media outlet can circumvent the position of the powerful as the ‘gatekeepers’ of information.

This is the concept of the BBC, but the reality is far from it. A major content analysis from Cardiff University reveals the BBC is in fact pro-business and conservative leaning in its coverage, contrary to George Osborne’s claims that the BBC has an ‘anti-business’ slant.

The study found that on BBC News at Six, business representatives outnumbered trade union spokespersons by a ratio of more than 5-to-1 in 2007, and of 19-to-1 in 2012. Research into the BBC coverage of the 2008 financial crisis revealed similar pro-business sentiment. Opinion was almost completely dominated by investment bankers, stockbrokers and other city voices.



Not only does the corporation give disproportionate voice to big business, but it gives Tories more airtime than Labour. When Gordon Brown was in power in 2007, his coverage exceeded that of David Cameron by a ratio of 2-to-1. This is to be expected: the current Prime Minister will get more airtime. But, in 2012 Cameron’s coverage exceeded that of Ed Miliband by double that ratio (4-to-1).

One might say Labour’s reluctance to put Miliband front and centre is the reason for this. However, the study found much the same disparity when comparing cabinet members and ministers to their counterparts in the shadow cabinet.

Under a Conservative government in 2012, coverage of Tory ministers exceeded that of their Labour counterparts, again by more than 4-to-1. Meanwhile, under the 2007 Labour government, Labour ministers’ exceeded that of their Conservative counterparts, again by only 2-to-1. Factoring in who is presently in power, the Tories still get double the airtime Labour do.

A root cause of this is the way members of the BBC Trust are selected. The BBC Trust is the body that governs and regulates the corporation. Currently, the monarch appoints BBC Trust members on the advice of government ministers. This has led to a public service run by people with strong business and political affiliation.

Rona Fairhead was made Chairwoman of the BBC Trust on the recommendation of former Conservative culture secretary Sajid Javid. She serves on the board of directors of several large corporations, including PepsiCo and HSBC. She is also the business ambassador for the UK Trade and Investment governing body.

The Vice-Chairwoman, Diane Coyle, sits on the advisory panel for EDF and is managing director of ‘Enlightenment Economics’, an economic consultancy for large corporate clients, such as Vodaphone.

The presenter for the BBC’s flagship political programme Daily Politics is Andrew Neil, chairman of the conservative news outlet ‘The Spectator’ and publisher of London global business magazine, ‘The Business’.

The business editor is Kamal Ahmed of the right-wing Sunday Telegraph, who was rebuked by the Guardian’s Nick Davies for ‘banging the war drums’ over the invasion of Iraq.

We might avoid such disproportionate coverage were the regulatory body not spearheaded by tycoons. While they may not actively seek to advance a particular agenda, they are predisposed to the ideology behind their affiliations.

The BBC is worth fighting for. The concept is incredible, but it needs huge reform. The government should not simply dictate who sits on the regulatory body. The BBC Trust should be representative of the public it is supposed to serve, not the vested interest it is supposed to bypass.

When Darvall tells us to trust nothing we read in the media, his advice penetrates even the BBC, which is often considered the global standard of honest journalism.

Police were called to the upmarket Dupont Circle Hotel at about 11.30am on Thursday and found him dead. The Russian Embassy confirmed Lesin had died.

A police spokesman would only confirmed that a 'death investigation' had been launched.

In a statement released by the Kremlin's press service, Putin said: 'The president has a high appreciation for Mikhail Lesin’s massive contribution to the creation of modern Russian mass media.'

Lesin owns multiple properties in Los Angeles worth at least $28million, arousing suspicions among officials who called for a money laundering probe.

Republican Senator Roger Wicker wrote a letter to then Attorney General Eric Holder in December 2013 saying Lesin had 'multi-million dollar assets' in the US and Europe.



President Putin paid tribute to Lesin (behind Putin), saying he had made a 'massive contribution' to Russian mass media. The station said Lesin was responsible for 'inspiring the creation' of the agency, which is widely regarded in the West as a mouthpiece for the Kremlin. 

'That a Russian public servant could have amassed the considerable funds required to acquire and maintain these assets in Europe and the United States raises serious questions,' Wicker wrote.

Lesin's company the Dastel Corporation bought a 13,000 sq ft Beverl y Hills home in August 2011 for $13.8million and a 10,600 sq ft property in Brentwood for $9million in 2012, it was reported. It is not known whether the FBI launched an investigation.

Lesin, who was Russian press minister from 1999 to 2004 and presidential media adviser from 2004 to 2009, is credited with founding state television network Russia Today in 2005.

Secretary of State John Kerry has referred to Russia Today, often shortened to RT, as a 'propaganda bullhorn'.

Following the crisis in Ukraine, Kerry said: 'Russia Today network has deployed to promote president Putin's fantasy about what is playing out on the ground. 

'They almost spend full-time devoted to this effort, to propagandize, and to distort what is happening or not happening in Ukraine.' [Which is ironic given the pathetic propaganda spewed out by the controlled US media].

After leaving the Kremlin Lesin went on to become a senior executive at Gazprom-Media, Russia's largest media holding company. He resigned for family reasons last year.



The wealthy Russian was staying at the Dupont Circle Hotel, which charges up to $250 a night for a room. 

Lesin was married and had a daughter from his first marriage in 1979 and a son from his second marriage in 1983. He had five grandchildren.

His son Anton Lessine is a Hollywood film producer and worked on 2014 movies Fury, starring Brad Pitt, and Sabotage, featuring Arnold Schwarzenegger.


Russia Today: The 'Propaganda Bullhorn' Founded by Lesin

The idea for Russia Today (RT) was conceived by Mikhail Lesin as the Russian government sought to improve the public image of the country.

Before its conception in 2005, the head of the RIA Novosti news agency Svetlana Mironyuk said Russia was only known for 'communism, snow and poverty'.

Some would argue RT has done little to change that, with most of the West seeing the state-funded television network as a media arm for the Kremlin and Vladimir Putin.

During the conflict between Russia and Georgia in 2008, RT named Georgia as the aggressor, despite Russia invading parts of Georgia, which had merely defended itself against attack from the separatist governments of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.



The channel caused consternation in the US in 2010 when it released controversial adverts showing President Barack Obama merging into Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

It was captioned 'Who poses the greatest nuclear threat?' and subsequently banned in US airports, while a similar advert showing a soldier merging into a Taliban fighter causing similar uproar.

In 2012 RT's website was hacked by a group called Antileaks, believed to be because of Wikileaks chief Julian Assange backing of the channel or because of the jailing of protest group Pussy Riot. Secretary of State John Kerry has referred to Russia Today, often shortened to RT, as a 'propaganda bullhorn'.

The Romans came up with the idea that if you keep the people fed, watered and entertained - distracted - the 'elite' can get away with anything, behind the scenes. Today we have professional sports hysteria, mass media movies, mindless reality TV and music filling that role nicely, while subconsciously programming the masses with the themes and thoughtforms the elite decide on to further their agendas

The case is a difficult one. The chemtrails idea is that the contrails from many jets are not water vapour or wing-tip vortices but instead chemicals. Sprayed for some unknown purpose by persons unknown. The evidence appears to be, primarily, that jet "contrails" last a lot longer these days, often stretching from horizon to horizon and eventually spreading out to cover the sky.

Those lessons percolated for a couple of years. Radicalisation, he observes, often happens after some trauma. He still became a salesman, where he learned to talk and manipulate and sway people. He was pretty good at it, but there was a problem.

In 2008, the company offered him $6,000 if he would leave within the next five minutes.

When the money ran out, the financial pressure came on and he got depressed. He developed what he describes as "employer phobia" - a fear of being employed. This raises eyebrows, but he insists it's a real thing. "It was a panic attack. I went for an interview and had shortness of breath and my legs started coming out from under me. I was sweating and very uncomfortable".

"I knew I didn't want to work for someone else, I wanted to work with people," he says. He had intuited that both being under arrest and working for someone else was a form of slavery.

Just recently there were very hard times. His girlfriend - who leaves early in the morning for work - told him he had to get a job. He arranged an interview but suffered a panic attack the night before.

Just in time things got better. Through the protesting network he'd got spots on Radio Waatea and produced his own YouTube channel. It was spotted by the producers of a thing called American Freedom Radio, who recruited him about six months ago. He does a show, two hours five days a week, 5-7pm US Central time, 11am to 1pm in New Zealand.

Live radio and a simultaneous video feed on a webcast. It leaves him with about $50 to spend after it pays the rent on the basement flat the couple share in Glen Eden. People give him stuff - cigarettes and food and computers. He's looking for more, though. "I couldn't have done it without my girlfriend." He wants to be able to support them so she doesn't have to work.

His show is subtitled The Lighter Side of Genocide. It's a good rhyme and a good concept. Almost everyone flirts with a conspiracy theory, though usually just one. People with jobs, responsibility and families will tell you in conversational tones that parts of 9/11 may have been caused by missiles and that there might be something suspicious on the far side of the moon.

It's like Trade Me for conspiracies. Vinny and AFR can be intensely interesting to all of the people some of the time. And he likes a laugh.

There are radical fora on Triangle TV and other webcasts, but they're not for him. "They have the host and the false Left and false Right guest." Vinny thinks they are just different heads of the same hydra. "They will never invite me on." Freedom Radio thinks it has 100,000 listeners a day at some point. There is a rolling bar on the AFR site showing who has come online in the last five minutes. Thirty-five have shown up in the last segment. It shows addresses from all around the world. Someone is hearing this in Lower Hutt.

Vinny starts his intro, the show beaming live from the "Sunny slave South Pacific". Today's guest on the phone is Richard "Rick" Miller, a former trainer of navy Seals.

Except he's not there. Vinny has to riff for a full seven minutes while the producers track Rick down. This is hard, but not for Vinny. With no warning, he fills the air (the conspiracies are legion and provide endless talk).

Vinny's not trained in radio and it shows. He fluffs and mumbles, he's indistinct and too loud by turns. But there is a raw energy and showmanship that, cleaned up and disciplined, could make him conspiracy radio's Martin Devlin.

He tells a joke. "Paradox? I thought that was a half-bird, half oxen created by Monsanto" It is a joke and not a conspiracy theory. But you wonder if some who are listening get that.

Richard Miller turns up and the conversation starts.


It turns out that Miller thinks some things that many would consider strange:

Four-foot dandelions grow in Hawaii and people are getting sick from the (suppressed) spread of radiation from Japan's stricken reactors.

Caesium in San Francisco's milk is 100 per cent above Environmental Protection Authority levels.

He made particles go faster than the speed of light (if I'm hearing that correctly) in his junior year in high school.

The US detonated a nuclear weapon on Mars in 1967.

Followed by a manned mission in 1968.

The prime directive of the New World Order is that there are too many people and half of us have to die.

He has proved that 9/11 was a US government-run operation.

But he also thinks some interesting things:

That gardening should be a competitive sport.

And other things that make a good point:

That food should not be monetised.

The idea that financial speculation on food stocks is both immoral and dangerous is a real issue discussed by serious people in the real world - so much so that such crazed radicals as Germany's Deutsche Bank say they're not going to do it any more.

This is not suppressed, but it is not discussed widely in the Mainstream Media (MSM in conspiracy-speak). The reasons are probably banal, but Vinny and many others think we hide stuff. Vinny's producer, Mitch Santell, turns up and opens a beer. The Californian has been here five years.

He says the MSM won't tell you things they will - for instance, that vaccines are dangerous. He doesn't vaccinate his kids. Mitch says chemtrails began in New Zealand not long after he got here in 2008. He has noticed definite changes in the weather. He says alternative media will eventually replace the MSM. This could be his best theory.

Putting aside the content of the show, there are things going on in Vinny's home that could probably only happen in a semiprofessional and fully ideologically committed media. The flat is the same as 200 others in this suburb. A poster condemning the current prime minister, a Swiss ball, the modesty of old couches covered by feminine coverlets.

There's unknown art on the wall and worn flatware on its third life. A scene unchanged for most cool young Westie couples since the 1970s. The two beautiful and monster-sized silver Macs in the flat are the only thing different and they are revolutionary.

They mean, with the addition of a $100 Repco garage light, that from nowhere central Vinny can broadcast what is essentially a TV show to a potential audience of everyone in the world.

Vinny and his guest talk to callers on a multichannel Skype feed for an hour after the show. He writes and videos and records and then puts it all on one page. His business model involves donations and subscriptions as well as paid ads. A lot has been said in polished corporate boardrooms about this being the future for media. But it's the part-time skint guy in bare feet with no media training (who believes the sky is falling) who is doing it right now. The medium might be the show's biggest message.

Mitch is the product of an old Hollywood family, brought up on showbiz and its politics. He's an experienced radio hand and talks assuredly about the ins and outs of who's going where in US conspiracy radio and why that's a mistake. Exposing the inner workings of the world is, a little ironically, big business.

The top dog worldwide is probably Infowar's Alex Jones, whose viewers and listeners and watchers across his multimedia empire stretch into the tens of millions. George Noory posts similar numbers with his older, more radio-focused audience. The "truthers", as Mitch calls them, also claim madcap Russian TV host Max Keiser (seen here on Sky), who regularly talks to people on shaky internet connections from the basements of occupied Amerikkka.

There's a question I know the pair will not be able to answer. A beautiful post-modern killer app that will warp their twisted minds straight. Why am I, a sucker on the Fairfax tentacle of the MSM octopus, sitting here now saying this? Why am I providing them the air of publicity?

Shouldn't I be busy maintaining the necessary illusions that keep the sheep tame? Vinny says he checked me out (someone actually has been ringing around) and - in summary - I brook no controls over my wandering. A wild thing, hunting in the jungle of lies for the truth that is my only sustenance.

Which is a nice thing to say and proves he was a good salesman, but more aspirational than accurate. I get an insight, too - a conspiracy theory (as opposed to an actual conspiracy or the harmful reaction to a supposed conspiracy) is a lot of fun. Like telling a ghost story. Especially if you are supposed to be on the inside of it.

The temptation to stir the pot and encourage with false evidence is almost overwhelming. The truth is, however, that everyone up and down the MSM control apparatus is very interested in what he is about.

Vinny doesn't believe every conspiracy theory: the fluoride thing, yes, because he's seen the science. But a caller accused him of causing a tornado on the North Shore by not accepting Jesus as his saviour. He doesn't believe that. He does think all conspiracies - his word - tie into each other somehow.

Thus the JFK shooting is related to the fluoride issue in some way currently unclear. But all in the family are not equal. It has its black sheep.

The pair don't roll that way. They snort derision at the dude who seriously claims actress Tina Fey, politician Sarah Palin and a third woman are actually the same person. Based on measurements of their ear lobes.

Ridiculous and we all laugh together, at last. "That guy's f. . .king crazy," says Vinny.

Patent For Video Monitor Nervous System Manipulation
November 10 2015 | From: TheRealStrategy

Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors
US 6506148 B2



Patent Abstract

Nervous System Manipulation

The technology has the capability of controlling the specific frequency necessary to excite certain senses and incite specific emotions. This means, that while unsuspecting citizens and audiences are viewing video streams, whether through a television, computer, cell phone, or even at a movie theater, your emotions could be triggered through physiological technology without your knowing.

This technology could excite anger when certain images are being viewed, then associate those feelings with whatever agenda the creator wants. The same goes for sexual stimulation, fear, happiness, etc…

Manipulating people’s nerves, to excite and alter emotions can be used as a weapon of control against the masses. This patent was filed in 2003 by Hendricus Loos. Who know’s what it is being used for.



These infrasonic frequencies are not only being pulsed out of video monitoring systems, they can come from anything, including satellites, WiFi, Bluetooth, Microwaves, On*Star, or any other transmitter that pulses frequencies – including your radio.

Infrasound

This technology is an advancement into infrasound technologies which have been around for some 50 years or more. The Russians invented infrasound weapons after World War 2. The idea was to control massive amounts of soldiers from a distance, possibly even putting them to sleep.



In Kazakhstan, over the last 2 years there have been major reports of thousands of people falling asleep and having sexual or violent outbursts after one of these sleep episodes which last for days or even weeks. Also, immediate memory loss has been reported in many cases, and those affected often don’t remember what happened during the episode.

Read “Mystery in Kazakhstan” and learn how Infrasound is the only explanation for this phenomena.

Infrasound is any frequency below 20Hz, which is generally the limit of human hearing.

Bastoy Prison: The World’s Nicest Prison
November 9 2015 | From: AmusingPlanet

About 75 kilometers off the coast of Oslo in Norway, is an island that's home to some 115 criminals, including the the country’s most dangerous, convicted of crimes such as murder, rape and drug dealing.



An inmate sentenced to sixteen years and a half for murder and narcotics related crime is seen sun bathing in front of the wooden cottage where he lives in Bastoy Prison.

However, doing time here is like being on a holiday. There are no barbed-wire-topped walls or electrified fences circle the island, nor do armed guards and attack dogs patrol the grounds. Prisoners live in brightly painted small wooden cottages, and tend to farm animals, grow crops and chop wood.

For recreation, there's a beach where prisoners sunbathe in the summer, plenty of good fishing spots, horses for riding, a sauna and tennis courts. Dinner offers a choice of dishes such as “fish balls with white sauce and shrimps" and everything from chicken con carne to salmon. It's like “the holiday version of Alcatraz.”

The kind of treatment offered to these prisoners usually perplex, sometimes even offend people who believe that prison should be a place of deprivation and penance rather than domestic comfort.

But if the goal of prison is to change people, Bastoy seems to work. Only 16% of prisoners who come out of Bastoy reoffend within two years of being released, compared to Norway's national average of 20 percent, and the European average of 70%.

Last week, something remarkable happened;

The Bank of England let the cat out of the bag. In a paper called "Money Creation in the Modern Economy", co-authored by three economists from the Bank's Monetary Analysis Directorate, they stated outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong, and that the kind of populist, heterodox positions more ordinarily associated with groups such as Occupy Wall Street are correct. In doing so, they have effectively thrown the entire theoretical basis for austerity out of the window.

To get a sense of how radical the Bank's new position is, consider the conventional view, which continues to be the basis of all respectable debate on public policy. People put their money in banks. Banks then lend that money out at interest - either to consumers, or to entrepreneurs willing to invest it in some profitable enterprise.

True, the fractional reserve system does allow banks to lend out considerably more than they hold in reserve, and true, if savings don't suffice, private banks can seek to borrow more from the central bank.

The central bank can print as much money as it wishes. But it is also careful not to print too much. In fact, we are often told this is why independent central banks exist in the first place. If governments could print money themselves, they would surely put out too much of it, and the resulting inflation would throw the economy into chaos.



Institutions such as the Bank of England or US Federal Reserve were created to carefully regulate the money supply to prevent inflation. This is why they are forbidden to directly fund the government, say, by buying treasury bonds, but instead fund private economic activity that the government merely taxes.

It's this understanding that allows us to continue to talk about money as if it were a limited resource like bauxite or petroleum, to say "there's just not enough money" to fund social programmes, to speak of the immorality of government debt or of public spending "crowding out" the private sector.





What the Bank of England admitted this week is that none of this is really true. To quote from its own initial summary:

In other words, everything we know is not just wrong – it's backwards.

When banks make loans, they create money. This is because money is really just an IOU.

The role of the central bank is to preside over a legal order that effectively grants banks the exclusive right to create IOUs of a certain kind, ones that the government will recognise as legal tender by its willingness to accept them in payment of taxes.

There's really no limit on how much banks could create, provided they can find someone willing to borrow it.

They will never get caught short, for the simple reason that borrowers do not, generally speaking, take the cash and put it under their mattresses; ultimately, any money a bank loans out will just end up back in some bank again.

So for the banking system as a whole, every loan just becomes another deposit. What's more, insofar as banks do need to acquire funds from the central bank, they can borrow as much as they like; all the latter really does is set the rate of interest, the cost of money, not its quantity.

Since the beginning of the recession, the US and British central banks have reduced that cost to almost nothing.

In fact, with "quantitative easing" they've been effectively pumping as much money as they can into the banks, without producing any inflationary effects.

Money created out of thin air - the debts you owe - your mortgage - DO NOT EXIST - and the elite 'banksters' are FUCKING YOU

What this means is that the real limit on the amount of money in circulation is not how much the central bank is willing to lend, but how much government, firms, and ordinary citizens, are willing to borrow.

Government spending is the main driver in all this (and the paper does admit, if you read it carefully, that the central bank does fund the government after all). So there's no question of public spending "crowding out" private investment. It's exactly the opposite.

Why did the Bank of England suddenly admit all this? Well, one reason is because it's obviously true.

The Bank's job is to actually run the system, and of late, the system has not been running especially well. It's possible that it decided that maintaining the fantasy-land version of economics that has proved so convenient to the rich is simply a luxury it can no longer afford.

But politically, this is taking an enormous risk. Just consider what might happen if mortgage holders realised the money the bank lent them is not, really, the life savings of some thrifty pensioner, but something the bank just whisked into existence through its possession of a magic wand which we, the public, handed over to it.

Historically, the Bank of England has tended to be a bellwether, staking out seeming radical positions that ultimately become new orthodoxies. If that's what's happening here, we might soon be in a position to learn if Henry Ford was right.

Young People Feel Betrayed By New Zealand Government
November 6 2015 | From: Stuff

Young people feel betrayed by Government over zero-hour contracts



The youth network of the Public Service Association (PSA), New Zealand’s largest union, says young people feel betrayed by the Government who have entrenched unfair zero-hour contracts instead of keeping their promise to get rid of them.

At the height of the 2014 Gaza war, Netanyahu revealed that he doesn’t envision Palestinian sovereignty in the West Bank anytime soon. “I think the Israeli people understand now what I always say: that there cannot be a situation, under any agreement, in which we relinquish security control of the territory west of the River Jordan,” he said at a press conference in Jerusalem. In other words: no withdrawal and no Palestinian sovereignty, which means no state of Palestine.

A few months later, Netanyahu said, in a much quoted interviewon the eve of the March 17election, that, “indeed,” no Palestinian state would be created under his leadership.

To add insult to hypocrisy, NZ does not act on its recommendations – it will not “make a move to first recognise the Palestinian state.”

Then loading more inanity on the ridiculous, NZ calls on the same incompetent clowns “the Quartet (United States, Russia, United Nations and European Union), Security Council members and Arab states” to maintain the posturing of the nihilistic negotiations.

So what can the people of Palestine expect from a flunkey state that belongs to the Impunity- for- Israel’s- War- Crimes Club?

A state furthermore that owns a government body, the New Zealand Super Fund that invests in and profits from a number of Israeli companies integrally connected to the illegal settlements and/or Israel’s arms industry such as Israel Chemicals which supplies white phosphorus to the USA which in turn sells its white phosphorous munitions back to Israel which then fires them illegally on innocent Gaza children such as little Hamza Almidani, 3.

Palestinians can expect the same old bystander impunity that exacerbates their suffering caused by the ongoing betrayal of NZ’s own obligations as a High Contracting Party to the Geneva Conventions to protect and uphold Palestinian political and human rights.

This ‘resolution’ comes at a crucial time when Palestinian children and youth are being extrajudicially executed in the street for their courageous efforts to uphold their rights while NZ fails them and, in doing so, shames the decency of the people of New Zealand.

Related: Captured ISIS Leaders in Iraq Confess to Receiving Military and Intelligence Support from the United States

Bombshell! Europe Drops Charges Against Edward Snowden, Offers Asylum And Protection
November 5 2015 | From: ActivistPost

This week, the European Parliament voted to offer Edward Snowden asylum and protection and drop all criminal charges against him.



When at one time most of the world was bullied by the US government into pressing charges against Snowden and forcing him into exile, the entire European continent has now officially given him a pass.

Related: EU Parliament Votes To Drop Charges Against Snowden

Thursday’s 285 – 281 vote officially recognized Snowden as an “international human rights defender” and ensured that he would be free from arrest within European borders.



The final resolution mentioned that “too little has been done to safeguard citizens’ fundamental rights following revelations of electronic mass surveillance.”

Snowden is currently living in asylum in Russia and is wanted in the United States for charges under the federal Espionage Act, but Russia has declined to extradite him. He has been unable to leave due to the fear of being kidnapped by the US military when he left the country, but now it may be possible for him to travel to Europe.

Snowden posted on his Twitter page that this could be a good sign of a shift in attitude towards his cause. Earlier this year, it was reported that a federal appeals court ruled that the controversial NSA spy program which collects phone records is actually illegal.

Snowden recently joined Twitter, making himself more visible and approachable to the general population than ever before.

Within a day of opening his first social media account since leaking information about the NSA spy program, Snowden gained over one million followers. However, there was only one account that he decided to follow, the NSA. The whistleblower’s first tweet read, “Can you hear me now?”

The iwi are instead taking pest control into their own hands and implementing a business plan to reduce possum numbers and generate income.

Jim Lewis has been making a living by possum trapping for the last 25 years.  He supplies meat for pet food and fur for luxury items, he says the demand is huge. “The supplier wants 300 tonne and he's only getting 150 tonne so it would be good to train it and make employment," said Lewis.

The pest control teams will then be armed with the right skills and knowledge to ensure pest control in their forest will become a reality.

This ‘theory’ has been rejected by mainstream scholars who say that history as we know it is more than accurate, and all of the alleged findings are simple hoaxes and lies. But what if they are not?

Is it possible as some researchers suggest, that highly advanced civilizations inhabited Earth hundreds of thousands of years ago? Even millions of years ago? And that the out-of-place artifacts that we have found in the past belong to them?

Here we have some of these mysterious findings that suggest mankind has been on Earth far longer than scholars accept.

The 250 Million year old Microchip

In Labinsk, Russia, researchers discovered what appears to be some sort of microchip embedded into stone. According to scholars this discovery marks the beginning of a completely new history, one that many ancient alien theorists have been talking about for years.



The object that researchers have found is believed to be some sort of ancient microchip and according to researchers, this ancient microchips dates back millions of years. After countless tests, researchers have come to the conclusion that this antique piece was used as some sort of microchip in ancient times. Many people have even noticed a mysterious “marking” on the microchip: K2000.

The million dollar question is, who and what used a microchip that dates back 250 million years? Is there a possibility that this is in fact the remains of ancient technology? Technology that belonged to a highly advanced civilization that inhabited Earth millions of years ago? Or is there a possibility that this artifact did not originate from Earth, but on another planet, belonging to an extraterrestrial race.

The 300 Million year old Screw Embedded in Stone

According to reports from news agencies in China, a mysterious object that was discovered in 2002 could be the ultimate evidence of prehistoric civilizations on Earth. Not thousands, but hundreds of millions of years ago. The Lanzhou screw is believed to be similar to the one found in Russia in the 90’s.

According to Lanzhou Morning News; After a discussion about the possibility of being man-made and the possible reasons for its formation, scientists unanimously labeled the stone as one of the most valuable in China and in the world of collection, research and Archaeological studies.

Related: NASA releases images of enormous 8,000-year-old patterns

About 180 New Zealanders died from liver cancer each year, he said.

Dr Smith admitted he was leaving the door open for the threshold for approval of GM changing.

There was an international argument about what was a GMO and what was not.

Humans had been selectively breeding, using techniques to enhance mutations for decades, he said.

There was a wide range of definitions of the line but New Zealand needed to be cautious, he said.

Councils were welcome to submit to the EPA, and he had confidence in its robust and thorough processes.

Another fact emerges that the Egyptian flight control tower confirmed that the pilot was trying to control the plane’s descent but have no prior complaint about any trouble.

Q1. If the Russian plane was technically sound prior to flight, why were the pilots deterred to send an SOS call on time? What made the whole system completely disabled to make such call impossible in case when a technical malfunction was detected mid-flight?

There’s only one possible logical answer: the damage to the whole system was quick and abrupt. Mechanical and electrical troubles are out of the picture considering the redundancy of any system such as aviation.

Even the Egyptian authorities are confirming tha tt the pilots did not mention any technical or mechanical troubles mid-flight.

And for the pilot to have tried to control its descent suggest that indeed the communication system was completely severed early on, possible only by an external force hitting behind the pilots’ cockpit, and only those at the control tower could visually determine that while the flight crew were struggling to control its descent, the flight was already doomed.

The only time a plane crashes on its own is when it is depleted of fuel. Crashes due to deteriorating mechanical integrity can be anticipated beforehand and ignored at the same time, both of which do not result to the pilots being unable to call for help.

Q2. What caused the plane to experience a total system failure in such a short time as to prevent the pilots from sending out SOS call?

Externally induced failure either by electronic means or kinetic.

When both mechanical and electrical troubles happen at the same and such a short time, rendering the plane totally unmaneuverable, only one thing is certain: the plane was subjected to a high velocity projectile, or a surface to air missile attack.

Q3. If Russian flight 7K9268 was attacked, who and what motivated the attack?

Regular readers of this blog are fully aware that there’s an ongoing multi-pronged covert war being waged between the BRICS and the Khazarian organized crime syndicate and they may have already formed intelligent conclusions as to who and why such senseless attack was done.

Obviously, when Russia made the noble call to help Syria in its fight against extremism, the Russian authorities have already made prior contingencies. In fact, the whole establishment has been on constant alert amidst prior attacks on civilian targets in the recent past, e.g. Beslan School Siege, and especially with the events in Ukraine. But the Russians are obviously only limited in their own sphere as far as alert level preparations are concerned.

When other countries are involved, Russian civilian security is at the mercy of that country.

So, when Egypt participated in the repulsion of the Islamic State, considering that the latter is just composed in part of recycled Muslim Brotherhood fanatics that the present Sisi government has toppled years ago, the country is to some level might have made the necessary security measures.

But what boggles the mind is why a similar flight path was permitted as that of the Malaysian MH17 in Ukraine, i.e. over a territory of ongoing conflict?




REUTERS/StringerEgypt’s Prime Minister Sherif Ismail (2nd L) and Tourism Minister Hisham Zaazou look at the remains of a Russian airliner which crashed in …

Were both Russia and Egypt have become too complacent because of their earlier successes inside Syria where Russian Sukhoi S-34s have destroyed highly valuable ISIS positions, including this bridge that was cut-off just a few days ago.

Related: Russian Air Force cuts off ISIS supply lines by bombing bridge over Euphrates

Or, were both countries fully aware of the fact that the ISIS militants in the area of the Sinai Peninsula have no capability to launch such an attack.

Another major event prior to the plane crash was Russia flight maneuvers in the South China Sea which we interpreted as a response to the Aegis destroyer USS Lassen maneuver within 12 miles of Chinese artificial islands turned airstrips in the Spratlys.

These successions of provocation and counter-provocation are dangerously courting a major exchange of firepower that we already know would result to ELE for mankind. We are closely monitoring how the Eastern Alliance would respond to the deaths of Russian civilians without causing a major escalation of this covert hybrid geopolitical conflict.

With the obvious rejection of Israel’s and Saudi Arabia’s request to Russia for the immediate removal of Assad,  and the close proximity of Israel to the area of the incident, it is highly probable that if such missile attack was indeed done, only entities based in Israel could have actually done it, considering the fact that ISIS itself is disabled.

So that when somebody uploaded the original video of the purported attack and subsequently, deleted the account, the actual perpetrator may have decided to cover its own tracks before forensic analyst could determine who really uploaded the video.

Who Were The Victims?

Said recovery of the victims will last several more days. This further supports the notion that the spread of the explosion covered at least 5 mile radius, i.e. the plane did not crash down in one piece.

There’s a huge plausibility that the ill-fated Russian flight 9268 was a very special flight considering the exclusivity of the passengers. The all Russian flight could be composed of personnel engaging in mutual economic arrangements as the BRICS nations are trying to redevelop Eurasia, Africa and the Middle East through the economic blueprint of the New Silk Road led by China.

We have been expecting the first infrastructure loans to be awarded by the AIIB at the end of the year or early next year. Three financial institutions are being organized and put into operation to accomodate the requirements of Third World countries not properly served by the IMF and World Bank.

China is even planning to make huge investments into Israel as part of the whole Silk Road program. And for Israel to have initiated the Russian plane crash is a clear sign that the whole Khazarian Gangster Club is still not abandoning their global totalitarian ambition.

Latest developments would strongly support that theory…

US Special Forces deployed as ‘human shields’ to salvage terror assets in Syria

Finian Cunningham (born 1963) has written extensively on international affairs, with articles published in several languages. Originally from Belfast, Ireland, he is a Master’s graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a career in newspaper journalism.

For over 20 years he worked as an editor and writer in major news media organizations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent. Now a freelance journalist based in East Africa, his columns appear on RT, Sputnik, Strategic Culture Foundation and Press TV.

Obama’s decision to send Special Forces into Syria is being widely viewed as a US military escalation in the country. The troop dispatch also signals that the US trying to forestall Russian successes in wiping out Washington’s regime-change assets in Syria.

In short, the US Special Forces are being used as “human shields” to curb Russian air strikes against anti-government mercenaries, many of whom are instrumental in Washington’s regime-change objective in Syria.

‘Watershed moment’: UK starts building new permanent navy base in Bahrain

The UK has begun the construction of a new Royal Navy facility in Bahrain, which will become the first permanent British military base in the Middle East in over four decades. It is designed to assert influence over the Gulf and to fight extremist elements in the region.

The British Foreign Secretary, accompanied by navy personnel, attended the grand ceremony at Bahrain’s Mina Salman Port, marking the beginning of construction works at the new Royal Navy base.

Conclusions

The events leading to the Russian Flight 7K9268 crash are hard to ignore:

The critical destruction of the supply lines to ISIS militants which should have angered the CIA,

The reported injury of ISIS leader Al Baghdadi in the earlier period of the Russian assault on the terror group,

The total destruction to ISIS arms and ammunition depots,

The rejection of Netanyahu’s requests for “Assad to go” at the Kremlin,

The rejection of the House of Saud’s request for closer collaboration with the Russians amidst IMF projection of bankruptcy by 2020,

The recent foiling of Saudi Arabia’s elaborate plan to capture and occupy the Syrian capital of Damascus [here];

The recent Russian reconnaissance flyby within a mile away of USS Ronald Reagan,

The rising 90% popularity rating of Vladimir Putin,

The overwhelmingly positive reception of the entire Russian efforts throughout the globe,

The successful recovery of at least 70% of the Chinese Collateral Accounts [here],

Tthe massive resignations of not less than 2,500 central bankers and CEOs worldwide in 2012 [here], and subsequent murder of several bankers that could have served as potential witnesses to the massive rigging of the global financial system;;

The resignation of WB president Zoellick and Pedophile Pope Benedict in 2013, and;

The exposé of their plan to occupy a New Zealand territory as part of their escape plan [here].

… are all hard for Khazarians to accept.

It is not a delusion, therefore, to say that the world of these hardliners is shrinking by the minute and they are not going quietly in to the night. They will bring as many casualties as possible just to satisfy their lust for death and destruction even to the very end.

We have been expecting this to happen as the endgame is progressing, although, we wish the Good Guys should have neutralized them for good already as opposed to making peace with irredeemable breed of animals.

As always, we implore everyone to take necessary precautions wherever you are today. Be very vigilant.

Some of the criticism (that the Police are acting as "totalitarian enforcers" for example) is a little unfair, particularly where the request was made of Westpac, which was fully capable of looking after itself, as did the other organisations that refused the Police request. In the absence of any evidence of political motivation, the Police were doing what they considered to be their job.

They operated within the bounds of the Privacy Act, which, as we shall see, envisages information being provided by an "agency" (a Privacy Act term for a holder of personal information) such as a bank, without the need for any court order.

That's not to say that the Police weren't pushing the boundaries.

It's revealing they did not proceed to obtain court orders against the other organisations that refused their request.

Perhaps the Police got all they needed from Westpac, or perhaps they didn't quite have enough evidence to chance refusal of an application to the Court for a production order in respect of the personal information of a high profile person like Mr Hager.

But, it's Westpac's approach that we're more interested in. Let's first understand what has happened here.

Sometimes banks, ISPs and other agencies that hold information of value to the Police and other enforcement authorities will agree information sharing protocols with those authorities.

Those protocols might detail what level of information the agency is prepared to give up without a court order under a Privacy Act exception, who the request should be directed to within the agency (usually in-house legal/privacy officer), what seniority of officer must make the request and other particular processes that suit the agency. This may be what Westpac has referred to in the media as its "internal policy".

That policy has now apparently been clarified (more on this below).

If there was such a protocol, we expect it wasn't followed as it seems highly unlikely that any in-house legal team or privacy officer would have approved informal release in this way for fear of exactly the media storm that has occurred.

Two things we know though.

Firstly, that the information in question is personal information under the Privacy Act. That's easy when we're talking about confidential financial information.

Secondly, it's clear it was released in response to an informal request by the Police without a court order.

But, contrary to various reports we've seen, this does not automatically mean there has been any Privacy Act breach. The Privacy Act allows an agency to disclose personal information, without the consent of the individual, where (among other exceptions) that:

So, the Police would have sent a request to Westpac, referencing this exception to the prohibition on disclosure without consent and, presumably (although, maybe not, given that other agencies refused), providing evidence why the information was "necessary". 

The interesting thing about these requests is, while they have no more legal weight than a quick email from the proverbial Constable Smith, they often look very "official".

Here's an example of a form that was provided to us recently, complete with the official Police logo and persuasively formal language. But, it's still just a request.

When Westpac received the request, whether in this form or any other, its role as the agency holding the personal information, in order to comply with its obligations under the Privacy Act, was to first decide whether it had enough information to determine that the above exception applied - i.e., was disclosure "necessary ... for the ... investigation of an offence". This is Westpac's responsibility. The fact that the request came from the Police does not absolve it from that.

But, even if Westpac did determine that the exception applied, it still had a choice. It would have been perfectly legitimate for it to decide not to release the information and require a court order, as the other organisations that refused the Police request appear to have done.

In those circumstances, assuming they had enough evidence to persuade an issuing officer of the Court, the Police or other enforcement authority would apply for a production order, which is like a warrant except typically used to obtain information from third parties who are not in any way involved in the alleged offence itself. Here's an example of one obtained in respect of allegedly objectionable material uploaded by a user to an overseas content host client's systems, which evidence our client wished to share with New Zealand authorities. 

Production orders are approved by District Court registrars or other officers of the Court specifically authorised as issuing officers under the Search and Surveillance Act.

As you can see, a production order is based on submission of evidence sufficient to reasonably satisfy the issuing officer that an offence has been committed, so a higher bar than simply making a request.

Despite the Privacy Act allowing disclosure in certain circumstances, our view is a production order should be obtained unless there is an imminent threat, which means that the short delay in obtaining one is outweighed by the danger to personal safety or property. This protects the agency holding the information from having to cast aside its customer's privacy on the basis of an assessment of "necessity" that may be difficult for it to make. It no longer has a choice. It also protects the enforcement authority from overstepping the mark and opening itself up to the very criticisms that have been levelled at the Police in this case.

As we said though, sometimes even the hours or days that may be required to get a production order may be too long to wait. Child exploitation situations are an obvious example. These are the type of situation covered by another exception to the non-disclosure rule (IPP 11(f)(ii)). So, we wonder if Westpac's reported change to its "internal policy", that it will now always require a production order for any financial information, goes too far the other way. Privacy is never an all or nothing equation. 

We are biased because we wrote it, but an example of a more nuanced approach can be seen with Mega's takedown guidance.

Which brings us to our final point. Given the increasing amount of personal information (including metadata) now held by third parties, particularly as a result of all of our internet use, there is a need for much clearer public explanation by agencies who hold our information as to whether and how it will be released. "Internal policies" no longer cut it in our view.

1 I don’t want anyone in my family to observe a holiday that celebrates death, witchcraft and the occult.  This year, millions of Americans will participate in activities that could potentially open up a door for demonic activity.

2 The average American spends $74.34 on the holiday.  I would rather save the money.

3 Millions of women use Halloween as an excuse to dress like street walkers, and millions of men use Halloween as an excuse to act like sexual predators.

4 Even little girls as young as three years old are being dressed up in sexually provocative costumes.  What kind of message does this send to them?

5 Dressing up little children as ghosts, demons and vampires is not healthy for them.  In recent years, there has been a trend to make costumes for children as hellish as possible.

6 Originally, costumes were worn on October 31st “to change the personality of the wearer to allow for communication with the spirit world“.  For 11 years in a row, dressing up as a witch has been the number one costume choice for adults in the United States.

7 In ancient Britain, the festival known as Samhain was celebrated on October 31st.  It was supposedly a day when dead souls would revisit their old homes.  Personally, I don’t want anything to do with contacting the souls of the dead.

8 According to the History Channel, Samhain was also the day when the Druids “gathered to burn crops and animals as sacrifices to the Celtic deities”.

9 As I have written about previously, the fastest growing religion in America still practices a holiday known as “Samhain” to this very day.

10 According to Wiccans, Halloween is the time when the veil between the living and the dead is considered to be the thinnest.  They believe that on this day their god “dies” and is reborn every year on the Winter Solstice.  This year the winter solstice falls on December 22nd.

11 In ancient times, the resurrection of the sun god required human and animal sacrifice.  The following is what occult expert Bill Schnoebelen says that the Druids would do at this time of the year…

12 To this day, animal torture and sacrifice is still practiced on Halloween by occultists.  Many animal shelters will not adopt out black cats during the month of October for this very reason.

13 In the early seventh century, a Catholic Pope known as Gregory the First decided that the best approach to ensure the continued spread of Catholicism was to “christianize” existing pagan holidays and practices…

16 On all Satanic holy days, there are children that get ritually abused. This has been documented repeatedly, and yet most people (including most Christians) don’t want to hear about it.

17 For Satanists, Halloween is one of the most important celebrations of the year.  On page 96 of the Satanic Bible, Anton LaVey wrote the following…

For more on this story, click Ryan Holmes article on LinkedIn. Facebook vs. Twitter vs. Snapchat: Who Will Win the News Wars?

Watch Mike Papantonio’s commentary on the death of corporate media:

These actions would be illegal for any American in any other circumstance, but members of Congress and high-ranking government officials are actually exempt from insider trading laws.

Years later, a 60 Minutes investigation aired on television which highlighted the government’s deep history of insider trading. The investigation sparked outrage, prompting Congress to pass “the STOCK Act” which was said to hold members of the government to the same standards as any American when it came to insider trading.

However, Congress watered down the bill and changed key elements that would hold them accountable, allowing them to return to business as usual, and escape any consequences for their prior crimes.

In an interview during the 60 Minutes investigation, Peter Schweizer of the Hoover Institute told Steve Kroft that:

Since it was passed, the STOCK Act has been more or less worthless. Whenever a politician is accused of anything, they are defended by other politicians and the investigation is immediately stonewalled.

For example, a former staffer for the House Ways and Means Committee, Brian Stutter was guilty of insider trading. However, he avoided charges because House Speaker John Boehner refused to hand over the evidence, and claimed that Sutter had legal immunity.

It seems that America operates on two different sets of laws – one set for those who claim to rule us, and another for everyone else.

We are talking about Special Access Programs (SAP). From these we have unacknowledged and waived SAPs. These programs do not exist publicly, but they do indeed exist. They are better known as ‘deep black programs.’

Dwight Eisenhower, former 5 star U.S. general (highest possible rank) and President of the United States also warned us about  secrecy and the acquisition of unwarranted influence within the “department of defence” with his farewell speech:

He warns us about the influence of the military industrial complex, and the influence and power it’s capable of. After Eisenhower the next and only other president that blew the whistle on secrecy beyond the government was president John F. Kennedy in one of his most famous speeches, he is also referring to the military industrial complex:

The amount that the US sets aside for sensitive operations each year is not allowed to be published for eyes outside of the intelligence community.


Click here to open a larger version of this image in a new window

We are in an age where the US is having a difficult time keeping sensitive information under wraps, and although there is an abundance of blatant information for the world to wake up to, that which is still kept under tight wraps has also become more transparent. Many phenomena previously labelled as merely a “conspiracy theory” are now surfacing as true and verifiable day after day.

Could some of these black budget programs be dealing with UFOs? There is a large amount of evidence to suggest that they do, and possibly even extraterrestrials. Documents from the NSA prove that UFOs and extraterrestrials are of high interest to the agency.



In fact I would like to mention that there is an overwhelming amount of evidence to suggest that these black budget programs deal with matters beyond our world. 

Garry McKinnon has also shed light on this fact, as have thousands of previously classified documents and statements from high level government and military personnel. The world within our own world must be quite fascinating, the fact that we are living in the time of transparency must mean that the truth cannot stay hidden forever.

Worlds Within Worlds 

Excerpt from the book “A.D. After Disclosure” written by Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel (8).

Richard Dolan’s Thoughts on the “Breakaway Civilization”

By now, the classified world has moved far beyond the reach of the public world, and far beyond in its power and capabilities.

Consider the story of a former NSA scientist who spoke with the authors. According to this individual, the NSA was operating computers during the mid-1960s with a processing clock-speed of roughly 650 megahertz(MHZ).

To put that in perspective, it took 35 years for personal computers in the consumer market to reach that speed.

Indeed, in 1965 there were no personal computers at all. Immediately, the near-fatal Apollo 13 mission in 1971 comes to mind, with its reliance on slide-rulers by mission specialist to guide the damaged NASA spacecraft back to Earth.

When presented with this image, the NSA scientist shrugged and stated that secret computational capabilities were too important to share with NASA. 



So in, in computing, the National Security Agency was an amazing 35 years ahead of the rest of the world. This leads one to wonder what its computational powers are today.

Another example was the U.S. air strike against Libya in 1986. The raid employed f-111 fighter aircraft. Left out of the mission, however, was the F-117A Nighthawk, better known as the stealth fighter.

It had been operational since 1983, but was still classified in 1986. In a form of logic both perverse and rational, the F-117A was so radically advanced that keeping it secret was more important than using it for this military mission.

Given the mixture of a treasure chest of government money, and private connections, the likelihood exists that six decades later there is a clandestine group that possesses:

Technology that is vastly superior to that of the “mainstream” world

The ability to explore areas of our world and surroundings presently unavailable to the rest of us

Scientific and cosmological understandings that give them greater insights into the nature of our world

A significant “built off the grid” infrastructure, partially underground, that affords them a high degree of secrecy and independence of action

This might well qualify them as a separate civilization – one that has broken away from our own, in effect, a breakaway civilization. Still interacting with our own, its members probably move back and forth between the official reality of what we are supposed to believe, and the other reality which encompasses new truths and challenges.

The Iraqi security forces said the captured colonel has already made shocking confessions.

This was not the first Israeli-made drone downed in Iraq. In August an Israeli Hermes drone was shot down in the vicinity of Baghdad Airport.

Related: Obama And The Western Allied States' “Fake War” Against The Islamic State (ISIS): The Islamic State Was Created And Is Protected By The U.S. And Its Allies

There are many names for this power structure, including the deep state, cabal, globalists, elitists, banksters, Zionists and Illuminati, to name but a few. This elite cabal serve to destroy that which doesn’t align with their interests, which as you may have guessed is chaos.

In addition, they might still have a successful psy-op campaign on the masses which is inducing some people further into their coma, yet this is disintegrating fast as they no longer dictate the perspective of alternative thinkers.

The reality is more and more truthseekers are breaking free.

They have so many names because they have so many fingers in so many pies, so it must be made clear that they’re the ones primarily controlling certain governmental action (including US national and foreign policy), the matrix-media and a high proportion of the global economic central and private banking systems.

They have many other layers and factions too. There are secret societies, corporate arms, patents on technological advances, legal mechanisms and political power, as well as a wealth of minions that blindly do their bidding.

If only these puppets realized that obeying their perceived masters is at the long-term expense of both themselves and their families, they would stand up and be counted as those who oppose the bloody take-over of our planet.

That leads to the main goal of the cabal; global governance. Once they solidify an overarching legal, social, psychological and even spiritual framework for the worlds people, then their power will be untouchable.

They will live on as ‘the men that united the world’, however the truth that wouldn’t reach the history books is that they desecrated, devalued and demonized so much of the cultural and natural wisdom that permeates humanity’s heart.

They are being challenged though. There are alliances that have formed between power brokers from both the West and East. This alliance, which I will call the Western-Eastern Development (WED), is the group engaged in a shadow war with the banksters.

At times they are engaged directly, such as the fiasco of the Middle East, and at others indirectly, such as through the creation of new economic structures.

The WEDs are a force of some Eastern power brokers, as well as many people and interest groups in the West who are opposed to the Zionist and New World Order agendas. You can read a fantastic breakdown of some of their recent chess moves here and here.

Of course the new occupation of Syria by the Russian and soon-to-arrive Chinese military is a direct ‘fuck you’ to the cabal.



After all, IS was funded and weaponized by them to oust Assad so that economic and political control could be further instituted throughout the Middle East. With a union formed there they hoped that the European and American unions, along with certain Eastern sell-outs, could combine for the successful implementation of a global governance.

Yet the tables appear to turning which is highly influenced by the energetic and consciousness shifts happening in our era. This may lead them to even more extreme measures, such as a false flag event which leads to WWIII with Russia, China, Iran and their affiliates.

On the other hand, their next move might be an orchestrated global economic meltdown so that agreements such as the TPP, TiSA and TTIP, as well as the UN’s ‘The 2030 Agenda’, could come into instant, dramatic and full-blown effect.

It must be recognized at this point that the UN was created by these shadow puppeteers and that these trade agreements are designed as precursors to a one world government. For an objective critique of the trade agreements, read here, and for the UN agenda, read here.

Furthermore, the stories that the sleeping masses are told, and even our so-called leaders, are full of lies, manipulation and propaganda.

We cannot afford to fall for this as a society any longer, otherwise we will continue to be complicit in an agenda that serves to immortalize the blood lines of these mentally ill people, at the expense of human culture, livelihood, health and life itself.

Now of course no power structure is free of corruption and greed, so the WEDs will need appropriate investigation too. Ideally it would be great if they all just came clean and was transparent with the masses so we could work out a team plan.

But given the current players have shown what they’re truly worth, it\s clear that they’re not the world leaders we need for an inclusive, honorable, healthy, progressive, equal and united global culture.

The vast majority of people just want love and peace. We need a progressive economy in which nobody slips through an intelligently and morally designed safety net.

The environment should be cared for in sustainable ways. We also need a value system that will encourage the true virtues to manifest including cooperating, rather than competing with each other.

Ultimately, the global power dance is in full swing. With a faltering global economy, geopolitical challenges, the WED alliance and the droves of truthseekers waking up, the ivory tower need a new plan.

If sense prevails, they’ll work with us to implement a transparent and truly just system for all of humanity’s future, however given their track record, its doubtful they’ll see the light.

It got even more interesting. Back in 2014, the Washington Post came out with an article by Jewish professor Daniel W. Drezner entitled, “Why Vladimir Putin’s strategic genius scares the heck out of me.”

In that article, Drezner seemed to resemble Gollum, the ambivalent creature from J. R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings.

Keep in mind that Gollum loves and hates the ring of power at the same time, as he “loves and hates himself.” Drezner’s article was partly titled “Putin’s strategic genius,” but he argued throughout that Putin’s strategic genius was actually a disaster. Drezner simply could not make a rational and coherent point.



We expect that kind of reasoning from Drezner because he is living in an irrational system, which at its core is diabolical.

He placed a cartoon in the article which displays Putin pouring blood all over the floor, which obviously represents Crimea. But the simple fact is that Drezner cannot seriously look at himself in the mirror and see blood all over his hands and face. The cartoon should actually represent what Drezner’s brethren have done all over the Middle East.

It was Drezner’s brethren, Jewish intellectuals and Neo-Bolsheviks, who ended up pursuing the war in Iraq. Granted, Drezner has criticized the war, but he could never name the real culprits who actually sent the six-trillion dollar bill to the American people.

In his 2007 article entitled “The New World Order,” Drezner wrote:

But who was pushing Bush, Drezner? Why couldn’t you just point your readers to simple sources like the Jewish Virtual Library, which has a list of those who were behind the Bush administration?



Why couldn’t you talk about people like Ben Bernanke and Larry Summers, two of the most corrupt individuals who are largely responsible for the economic chaos in the United States?